Rebuilding after wildfires: Factors influencing sustainable, resilient, expedient, and cost-effective housing recovery

The increasing frequency of destructive wildfires, fueled in part by climate change, creates an urgent need to understand how homes can be rebuilt in a post-fire context to produce rebuilding outcomes that balance sustainability, fire resilience, expediency, and cost. We analyzed these outcomes for 679 homes destroyed in Colorado during the Marshall Fire using permit data and field observations. Through descriptive exploratory analysis and multivariable linear and logistic regression, our study examined how factors such as builders, jurisdictions, homeowner decisions, building codes, home size, and housing design choices, influence these rebuilding outcomes. Results show that sustainability and fire resilience outcomes were strongly shaped by jurisdictional building codes and policy enforcement, whereas expediency and cost outcomes were more strongly influenced by builder type and home size. Homeowner decisions regarding heating systems and solar installations further affect sustainability, and homeowner association policies influence fire resilience. Production builders consistently delivered faster and less expensive homes, though their sustainability and fire resilience outcomes varied more than outcomes for custom builders. Contrary to common concerns, more advanced energy codes, wildfire codes, and energy systems were not associated with higher costs per square foot and often resulted in lower energy use, increasing long-term cost savings, highlighting that resilient and sustainable rebuilding can be achieved without compromising affordability. These findings offer valuable insights for future policy development and disaster recovery practices. • We analyze 679 post-wildfire rebuilds across three Boulder County jurisdictions. • Outcomes assessed: sustainability, fire resilience, expediency, and cost. • Builder type and jurisdiction strongly shape rebuilding pathways and outcomes. • Energy codes and system decisions drive more sustainable rebuilding outcomes. • Home fire resilience linked to codes and policy, and homeowner design choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105976
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rebuilding after wildfires: Factors influencing sustainable, resilient, expedient, and cost-effective housing recovery

Amy Javernick‐Will, Abbie B. Liel, I. Lee, Noah Gershon et al.
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Rebuilding after wildfires: Factors influencing sustainable, resilient, expedient, and cost-effective housing recovery

Amy Javernick‐Will, Abbie B. Liel, I. Lee, Noah Gershon, Laura Oullette
article en

Abstract

The increasing frequency of destructive wildfires, fueled in part by climate change, creates an urgent need to understand how homes can be rebuilt in a post-fire context to produce rebuilding outcomes that balance sustainability, fire resilience, expediency, and cost. We analyzed these outcomes for 679 homes destroyed in Colorado during the Marshall Fire using permit data and field observations. Through descriptive exploratory analysis and multivariable linear and logistic regression, our study examined how factors such as builders, jurisdictions, homeowner decisions, building codes, home size, and housing design choices, influence these rebuilding outcomes. Results show that sustainability and fire resilience outcomes were strongly shaped by jurisdictional building codes and policy enforcement, whereas expediency and cost outcomes were more strongly influenced by builder type and home size. Homeowner decisions regarding heating systems and solar installations further affect sustainability, and homeowner association policies influence fire resilience. Production builders consistently delivered faster and less expensive homes, though their sustainability and fire resilience outcomes varied more than outcomes for custom builders. Contrary to common concerns, more advanced energy codes, wildfire codes, and energy systems were not associated with higher costs per square foot and often resulted in lower energy use, increasing long-term cost savings, highlighting that resilient and sustainable rebuilding can be achieved without compromising affordability. These findings offer valuable insights for future policy development and disaster recovery practices. • We analyze 679 post-wildfire rebuilds across three Boulder County jurisdictions. • Outcomes assessed: sustainability, fire resilience, expediency, and cost. • Builder type and jurisdiction strongly shape rebuilding pathways and outcomes. • Energy codes and system decisions drive more sustainable rebuilding outcomes. • Home fire resilience linked to codes and policy, and homeowner design choices.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 132
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.