Patient Selection for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention: Not Too Early, Not Too Late

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common but frequently underrecognized condition associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Long regarded as a mere bystander of left-sided heart disease, TR was often left untreated, contributing to late referrals and poor surgical outcomes. The emergence of transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions has broadened therapeutic options, particularly for high-risk or inoperable patients. However, procedural success and clinical benefit critically depend on appropriate patient selection and timely intervention. This review outlines the evolving landscape of TR management, emphasizing the importance of anatomical and clinical stage-adapted device selection. Key determinants of feasibility and prognosis include right ventricular function and dimensions, TR severity, tricuspid valve leaflet and annular remodeling, and hemodynamic congestion. Advanced imaging modalities and invasive hemodynamics provide incremental value for risk stratification. While tricuspid valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) and orthotopic valve replacement are the most widely adopted techniques, direct annuloplasty, heterotopic valve replacement, and coaptation enhancement devices may be more appropriate in anatomically advanced stages. Despite symptomatic improvement and reduced heart failure hospitalizations across different treatment modalities, a survival benefit has yet to be demonstrated. Delayed referral remains a challenge, often precluding repair or even replacement strategies. Dedicated risk models may improve prognostication and guide procedural decision-making. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary approach incorporating multiparametric assessment is essential to identify optimal candidates, guide timing, and personalize therapy. Ongoing trials and long-term outcome data are needed to refine treatment algorithms and clarify the role of early intervention in altering the natural course of severe TR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Heart
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shj.2025.100788
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Selection for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention: Not Too Early, Not Too Late

Juan F. Granada, Jennifer von Stein, Andrea Scotti, Maria C. Alu et al.
Structural Heart
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Patient Selection for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention: Not Too Early, Not Too Late

Juan F. Granada, Jennifer von Stein, Andrea Scotti, Maria C. Alu, Philipp von Stein, Azeem Latib, Edwin C. Ho
article en

Abstract

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common but frequently underrecognized condition associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Long regarded as a mere bystander of left-sided heart disease, TR was often left untreated, contributing to late referrals and poor surgical outcomes. The emergence of transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions has broadened therapeutic options, particularly for high-risk or inoperable patients. However, procedural success and clinical benefit critically depend on appropriate patient selection and timely intervention. This review outlines the evolving landscape of TR management, emphasizing the importance of anatomical and clinical stage-adapted device selection. Key determinants of feasibility and prognosis include right ventricular function and dimensions, TR severity, tricuspid valve leaflet and annular remodeling, and hemodynamic congestion. Advanced imaging modalities and invasive hemodynamics provide incremental value for risk stratification. While tricuspid valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) and orthotopic valve replacement are the most widely adopted techniques, direct annuloplasty, heterotopic valve replacement, and coaptation enhancement devices may be more appropriate in anatomically advanced stages. Despite symptomatic improvement and reduced heart failure hospitalizations across different treatment modalities, a survival benefit has yet to be demonstrated. Delayed referral remains a challenge, often precluding repair or even replacement strategies. Dedicated risk models may improve prognostication and guide procedural decision-making. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary approach incorporating multiparametric assessment is essential to identify optimal candidates, guide timing, and personalize therapy. Ongoing trials and long-term outcome data are needed to refine treatment algorithms and clarify the role of early intervention in altering the natural course of severe TR.

Structural HeartVol. 10(2)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), Cardiovascular Research Foundation (US), University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.