Dynamic hip screw vs femoral neck system for adult femoral neck fractures: A comparative meta-analysis

This study aimed to systematically evaluate and compare the outcomes of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and the Femoral Neck System (FNS) in managing adult femoral neck fractures through a meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of databases (WANFANG, VIP, CNKI, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and SinoMed) was conducted to identify eligible studies up to October 2023, to identify clinical controlled studies comparing FNS and DHS for femoral neck fracture treatment. After screening, quality appraisal, and data extraction, statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software. A total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting of one randomized controlled trial and seven cohort studies, covering 294 patients treated with FNS and 299 with DHS. Five studies originated from China, two from Germany, and one from Switzerland. Compared with DHS, the FNS group had shorter operative duration (MD = −20.13, 95% CI: −27.02 to −13.23, df = 6, P < 0.00001), reduced intraoperative blood loss (MD = −19.77, 95% CI: −28.72 to −10.81, df = 3, P < 0.0001), smaller incision length (MD = −0.59, 95% CI: −1.24 to −0.06, df = 2, P = 0.08), and higher Harris Hip Scores at the final follow-up (MD = 2.27, 95% CI: 0.89 to 3.65, df = 3, P = 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two fixation methods in fluoroscopy usage (MD = −5.79, 95% CI: −14.71 to 3.13, df = 1, P = 0.20), perioperative hemoglobin reduction (MD = −0.36, 95% CI: −0.87 to 0.15, df = 1, P = 0.16), hospital stay duration (MD = −0.41, 95% CI: −1.35 to 0.52, df = 4, P = 0.39), internal fixation failure rate (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.28, df = 5, P = 0.27), femoral neck shortening (MD = 0.42, 95% CI: −0.06 to 0.90, df = 2, P = 0.09), fracture nonunion rate (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.76, df = 4, P = 0.59), or femoral head necrosis rate (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.90, df = 3, P = 0.57). Compared to DHS, FNS demonstrates advantages in treating femoral neck fractures, including smaller incision length, shorter operative time, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and improved hip joint function. However, no significant differences were found in intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, perioperative hemoglobin reduction, hospital stay duration, or long-term complications such as fixation failure, femoral neck shortening, nonunion, and avascular necrosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Problems in Surgery
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2025.101965
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic hip screw vs femoral neck system for adult femoral neck fractures: A comparative meta-analysis

Weidong Tian, Wei Zhang, Xin Yang, Chunbiao Deng
Current Problems in Surgery
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Dynamic hip screw vs femoral neck system for adult femoral neck fractures: A comparative meta-analysis

Weidong Tian, Wei Zhang, Xin Yang, Chunbiao Deng
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically evaluate and compare the outcomes of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and the Femoral Neck System (FNS) in managing adult femoral neck fractures through a meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of databases (WANFANG, VIP, CNKI, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and SinoMed) was conducted to identify eligible studies up to October 2023, to identify clinical controlled studies comparing FNS and DHS for femoral neck fracture treatment. After screening, quality appraisal, and data extraction, statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software. A total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting of one randomized controlled trial and seven cohort studies, covering 294 patients treated with FNS and 299 with DHS. Five studies originated from China, two from Germany, and one from Switzerland. Compared with DHS, the FNS group had shorter operative duration (MD = −20.13, 95% CI: −27.02 to −13.23, df = 6, P < 0.00001), reduced intraoperative blood loss (MD = −19.77, 95% CI: −28.72 to −10.81, df = 3, P < 0.0001), smaller incision length (MD = −0.59, 95% CI: −1.24 to −0.06, df = 2, P = 0.08), and higher Harris Hip Scores at the final follow-up (MD = 2.27, 95% CI: 0.89 to 3.65, df = 3, P = 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two fixation methods in fluoroscopy usage (MD = −5.79, 95% CI: −14.71 to 3.13, df = 1, P = 0.20), perioperative hemoglobin reduction (MD = −0.36, 95% CI: −0.87 to 0.15, df = 1, P = 0.16), hospital stay duration (MD = −0.41, 95% CI: −1.35 to 0.52, df = 4, P = 0.39), internal fixation failure rate (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.28, df = 5, P = 0.27), femoral neck shortening (MD = 0.42, 95% CI: −0.06 to 0.90, df = 2, P = 0.09), fracture nonunion rate (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.76, df = 4, P = 0.59), or femoral head necrosis rate (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.90, df = 3, P = 0.57). Compared to DHS, FNS demonstrates advantages in treating femoral neck fractures, including smaller incision length, shorter operative time, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and improved hip joint function. However, no significant differences were found in intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, perioperative hemoglobin reduction, hospital stay duration, or long-term complications such as fixation failure, femoral neck shortening, nonunion, and avascular necrosis.

Current Problems in SurgeryVol. 75
North Sichuan Medical University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.