When ethical duties to ensure patient health and to minimise environmental impacts conflict in hospital design: Lessons from an Australian case study

Healthcare systems have an ethical duty to ensure equal access to high-quality healthcare as a matter of social justice. In their pursuit of that duty, they generate substantial environmental harms. For that reason, healthcare systems also have an ethical duty to minimise their environmental impacts as a matter of environmental justice and ecological justice. Many countries are already transitioning to less environmentally harmful healthcare. This study investigates whether the two duties come into tension when designing new green hospitals and how such tensions (if found to eventuate) are navigated in practice. We conducted case study research in collaboration with an Australian hospital network, with one of the network’s new public hospital builds comprising our case of focus. We undertook semi-structured interviews between March and June 2023 with those responsible for making design decisions in relation to the new public hospital being built. We analysed interview data thematically and report three main themes: separating the clinical and the environmental; tensions; and addressing tensions. We conclude by providing analysis of what is at stake in identified tensions using theories of justice, offering lessons that can help other hospitals mitigate against such tensions arising, and considering whether and when the moral reasoning employed in the case-under-study should be used to navigate the tensions. This study provides those responsible for green hospital design with a better understanding of what tensions they are likely to encounter between health, social, and environmental goods and how to reduce those tensions’ occurrence. That understanding will help them to identify and avoid such tensions in their practice, but further work is needed to develop ethical guidance on how they should navigate the tensions when they occur. • We identify tensions between patient health and mitigation in hospital design • We show how to analyse what’s at stake in those tensions as a matter of justice • We offer lessons on reducing those tensions’ occurrence in hospital design • We describe how those tensions are being addressed in practice

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Transitions
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2025.12.002
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When ethical duties to ensure patient health and to minimise environmental impacts conflict in hospital design: Lessons from an Australian case study

Bridget Pratt, David G. Kirchhoffer
Global Transitions
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

When ethical duties to ensure patient health and to minimise environmental impacts conflict in hospital design: Lessons from an Australian case study

Bridget Pratt, David G. Kirchhoffer
article en

Abstract

Healthcare systems have an ethical duty to ensure equal access to high-quality healthcare as a matter of social justice. In their pursuit of that duty, they generate substantial environmental harms. For that reason, healthcare systems also have an ethical duty to minimise their environmental impacts as a matter of environmental justice and ecological justice. Many countries are already transitioning to less environmentally harmful healthcare. This study investigates whether the two duties come into tension when designing new green hospitals and how such tensions (if found to eventuate) are navigated in practice. We conducted case study research in collaboration with an Australian hospital network, with one of the network’s new public hospital builds comprising our case of focus. We undertook semi-structured interviews between March and June 2023 with those responsible for making design decisions in relation to the new public hospital being built. We analysed interview data thematically and report three main themes: separating the clinical and the environmental; tensions; and addressing tensions. We conclude by providing analysis of what is at stake in identified tensions using theories of justice, offering lessons that can help other hospitals mitigate against such tensions arising, and considering whether and when the moral reasoning employed in the case-under-study should be used to navigate the tensions. This study provides those responsible for green hospital design with a better understanding of what tensions they are likely to encounter between health, social, and environmental goods and how to reduce those tensions’ occurrence. That understanding will help them to identify and avoid such tensions in their practice, but further work is needed to develop ethical guidance on how they should navigate the tensions when they occur. • We identify tensions between patient health and mitigation in hospital design • We show how to analyse what’s at stake in those tensions as a matter of justice • We offer lessons on reducing those tensions’ occurrence in hospital design • We describe how those tensions are being addressed in practice

Global TransitionsVol. 8(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.