Comprehensive benchmark of differential transcript usage analysis for bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing

Abstract RNA sequencing offers unique insights into transcriptome diversity, and a plethora of tools have been developed to analyze alternative splicing. One important task is to detect changes in the relative transcript abundance in differential transcript usage (DTU) analysis. The choice of the right analysis tool is nontrivial and depends on experimental factors such as the availability of single- or paired-end and bulk or single-cell data. To help users select the most promising tool, we performed a comprehensive benchmark of DTU detection tools. We cover a wide array of experimental settings, using simulated bulk and single-cell RNA-seq data as well as real transcriptomics datasets, including time-series data. Our results suggest that edgeR, DEXSeq, and LimmaDS are better choices for paired-end data, while DEXSeq and DSGseq can be used for single-end data. In single-cell simulation settings, we showed that satuRn performs better than DTUrtle. In addition, we showed that Spycone is optimal for time series DTU/isoform switch analysis based on the evidence provided using Gene Ontology (GO) terms enrichment analysis. Our study offers a comprehensive evaluation of DTU analysis in bulk and single-cell data and identifies the need for methods that differentiate DTU events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaf117
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive benchmark of differential transcript usage analysis for bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing

Markus Hoffmann, Markus List, Lina-Liv Willruth, Olga Tsoy et al.
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
article

Comprehensive benchmark of differential transcript usage analysis for bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing

Markus Hoffmann, Markus List, Lina-Liv Willruth, Olga Tsoy, Jan Baumbach, Chit Tong Lio, Tolga Düz
article en

Abstract

Abstract RNA sequencing offers unique insights into transcriptome diversity, and a plethora of tools have been developed to analyze alternative splicing. One important task is to detect changes in the relative transcript abundance in differential transcript usage (DTU) analysis. The choice of the right analysis tool is nontrivial and depends on experimental factors such as the availability of single- or paired-end and bulk or single-cell data. To help users select the most promising tool, we performed a comprehensive benchmark of DTU detection tools. We cover a wide array of experimental settings, using simulated bulk and single-cell RNA-seq data as well as real transcriptomics datasets, including time-series data. Our results suggest that edgeR, DEXSeq, and LimmaDS are better choices for paired-end data, while DEXSeq and DSGseq can be used for single-end data. In single-cell simulation settings, we showed that satuRn performs better than DTUrtle. In addition, we showed that Spycone is optimal for time series DTU/isoform switch analysis based on the evidence provided using Gene Ontology (GO) terms enrichment analysis. Our study offers a comprehensive evaluation of DTU analysis in bulk and single-cell data and identifies the need for methods that differentiate DTU events.

NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsVol. 7(3)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Southern Denmark (DK), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US), Leibniz-Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), HAW Hamburg (DE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.