Few-Shot Transfer Learning for Diabetes Risk Prediction Across Global Populations

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects over 537 million adults worldwide and disproportionately burdens low- and middle-income countries, where diagnostic resources are limited. Predictive models trained in one population often fail to generalize across regions due to shifts in feature distributions and measurement practices, hindering scalable screening efforts. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: We evaluated a few-shot domain adaptation framework using a simple multilayer perceptron with four shared clinical features (age, body mass index, mean arterial pressure, and plasma glucose) across three adult cohorts: Bangladesh (n = 5288), Iraq (n = 662), and the Pima Indian dataset (n = 768). For each of the six source-target pairs, we pre-trained on the source cohort and then fine-tuned on 1, 5, 10, and 20% of the labeled target examples, reserving the remaining for testing; a final 20% few-shot version was compared with threshold tuning. Discrimination and calibration performance metrics were used before and after adaptation. SHAP explainability analyses quantified shifts in feature importance and decision thresholds. <i>Results</i>: Several source → target transfers produced zero true positives under the strict source-only baseline at a fixed 0.5 decision threshold (e.g., Bangladesh → Pima F<sub>1</sub> = 0.00, 0/268 diabetics detected). Few-shot fine-tuning restored non-zero recall in all such cases, with F<sub>1</sub> improvements up to +0.63 and precision-recall gains in every zero-baseline transfer. In directions with moderate baseline performance (e.g., Bangladesh → Iraq, Iraq → Pima, Pima → Iraq), 20% few-shot adaptation with threshold tuning improved AUROC by +0.01 to +0.14 and accuracy by +4 to +17 percentage points while reducing Brier scores by up to 0.14 and ECE by approximately 30-80% (suggesting improved calibration). All but one transfer (Iraq → Bangladesh) demonstrated statistically significant improvement by McNemar's test (<i>p</i> < 0.001). SHAP analyses revealed population-specific threshold shifts: glucose inflection points ranged from ~120 mg/dL in Pima to ~150 mg/dL in Iraq, and the importance of BMI rose in Pima-targeted adaptations. <i>Conclusions</i>: Leveraging as few as 5-20% of local labels, few-shot domain adaptation enhances cross-population T2DM risk prediction using only routinely available features. This scalable, interpretable approach can democratize preventive screening in diverse, resource-constrained settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62010007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Few-Shot Transfer Learning for Diabetes Risk Prediction Across Global Populations

Enrico Maria Camporesi, John A. Hodgson, Shrinit Babel, Sunit Babel
1 citations
Medicina
Machine Learning in Healthcare
2.48
article

Few-Shot Transfer Learning for Diabetes Risk Prediction Across Global Populations

Enrico Maria Camporesi, John A. Hodgson, Shrinit Babel, Sunit Babel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects over 537 million adults worldwide and disproportionately burdens low- and middle-income countries, where diagnostic resources are limited. Predictive models trained in one population often fail to generalize across regions due to shifts in feature distributions and measurement practices, hindering scalable screening efforts. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: We evaluated a few-shot domain adaptation framework using a simple multilayer perceptron with four shared clinical features (age, body mass index, mean arterial pressure, and plasma glucose) across three adult cohorts: Bangladesh (n = 5288), Iraq (n = 662), and the Pima Indian dataset (n = 768). For each of the six source-target pairs, we pre-trained on the source cohort and then fine-tuned on 1, 5, 10, and 20% of the labeled target examples, reserving the remaining for testing; a final 20% few-shot version was compared with threshold tuning. Discrimination and calibration performance metrics were used before and after adaptation. SHAP explainability analyses quantified shifts in feature importance and decision thresholds. <i>Results</i>: Several source → target transfers produced zero true positives under the strict source-only baseline at a fixed 0.5 decision threshold (e.g., Bangladesh → Pima F<sub>1</sub> = 0.00, 0/268 diabetics detected). Few-shot fine-tuning restored non-zero recall in all such cases, with F<sub>1</sub> improvements up to +0.63 and precision-recall gains in every zero-baseline transfer. In directions with moderate baseline performance (e.g., Bangladesh → Iraq, Iraq → Pima, Pima → Iraq), 20% few-shot adaptation with threshold tuning improved AUROC by +0.01 to +0.14 and accuracy by +4 to +17 percentage points while reducing Brier scores by up to 0.14 and ECE by approximately 30-80% (suggesting improved calibration). All but one transfer (Iraq → Bangladesh) demonstrated statistically significant improvement by McNemar's test (<i>p</i> < 0.001). SHAP analyses revealed population-specific threshold shifts: glucose inflection points ranged from ~120 mg/dL in Pima to ~150 mg/dL in Iraq, and the importance of BMI rose in Pima-targeted adaptations. <i>Conclusions</i>: Leveraging as few as 5-20% of local labels, few-shot domain adaptation enhances cross-population T2DM risk prediction using only routinely available features. This scalable, interpretable approach can democratize preventive screening in diverse, resource-constrained settings.

MedicinaVol. 62(1)
University of South Florida (US), Tampa General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.