Control Techniques and Design of Load-Side Controls for the Mitigation of Late-Time High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse

This paper introduces a novel control archetype designed to mitigate high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) E3 disturbances on the power grid, as well as information on performance and specifications of different control laws for the controller archetype. This method of protection has been overlooked in the literature until now. A controlled voltage supply is placed on the load-side of a transformer, diverting unwanted power from the transformer core to prevent saturation. The controlled voltage source is modeled using four control laws: an integral controller (capacitor), Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), an energy storage minimized feedforward control law, and a Hamiltonian feedback law. Results show that the Hamiltonian feedback law and the energy storage minimization feedforward control law both flat-line magnetic flux with similar actuator requirements. The LQR approach requires less energy storage than the other two laws, depending on control tuning, as it allows greater exogenous current flow through the neutral path to ground. This leads to further optimization opportunities based on acceptable exogenous current levels. A sweep of different LQR gains revealed a reduction of approximately 32% in minimum control effort, 47% in minimum power to maintain saturation bounds, 20% in energy storage requirements, and 59% in required controller bandwidth. Voltage and bandwidth requirements of the load-side controller are comparable to neutral blocking requirements with energy and power requirements being higher for the load-side controller. This, however, comes with the benefit of being able to use pre-existing assets—neutral blocking devices have not been deployed. Additionally, the load-side blocking capacitor degrades transformer performance compared to the unmitigated system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010017
Primary Topic
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Control Techniques and Design of Load-Side Controls for the Mitigation of Late-Time High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse

Wayne W. Weaver, Rush D. Robinett, David G. Wilson, Connor A. Lehman
Energies
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
article

Control Techniques and Design of Load-Side Controls for the Mitigation of Late-Time High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse

Wayne W. Weaver, Rush D. Robinett, David G. Wilson, Connor A. Lehman
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel control archetype designed to mitigate high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) E3 disturbances on the power grid, as well as information on performance and specifications of different control laws for the controller archetype. This method of protection has been overlooked in the literature until now. A controlled voltage supply is placed on the load-side of a transformer, diverting unwanted power from the transformer core to prevent saturation. The controlled voltage source is modeled using four control laws: an integral controller (capacitor), Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), an energy storage minimized feedforward control law, and a Hamiltonian feedback law. Results show that the Hamiltonian feedback law and the energy storage minimization feedforward control law both flat-line magnetic flux with similar actuator requirements. The LQR approach requires less energy storage than the other two laws, depending on control tuning, as it allows greater exogenous current flow through the neutral path to ground. This leads to further optimization opportunities based on acceptable exogenous current levels. A sweep of different LQR gains revealed a reduction of approximately 32% in minimum control effort, 47% in minimum power to maintain saturation bounds, 20% in energy storage requirements, and 59% in required controller bandwidth. Voltage and bandwidth requirements of the load-side controller are comparable to neutral blocking requirements with energy and power requirements being higher for the load-side controller. This, however, comes with the benefit of being able to use pre-existing assets—neutral blocking devices have not been deployed. Additionally, the load-side blocking capacitor degrades transformer performance compared to the unmitigated system.

EnergiesVol. 19(1)
Michigan Technological University (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Sandia National Laboratories
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.