Designing with Generative AI: Using AI as a Design Partner in a Doctoral Program

This design case describes how we integrated Generative AI (GenAI) into a doctoral-level instructional leadership course and how students used the tool in real time. We positioned GenAI as a design partner as students drafted communications, analyzed data, and navigated complex school scenarios. As the course unfolded, we documented how students’ use of GenAI shaped ongoing redesign decisions. Three moments drove major adjustments: students relied too heavily on polished AI language, accepted AI-generated data interpretations without critique, and struggled to articulate their values during simulated decision-making. We responded by revising prompts, adding structured reflection cues, and reframing GenAI to better support professional judgment. Our design case describes how GenAI can catalyze reflection rather than replace thinking, helping students test ideas, surface assumptions, and strengthen their leadership voice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Designs for Learning
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v16i2.41981
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing with Generative AI: Using AI as a Design Partner in a Doctoral Program

Michele Garabedian Stork, Lisa Vodola, Sara Vicas, Krista Bixler
International Journal of Designs for Learning
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Designing with Generative AI: Using AI as a Design Partner in a Doctoral Program

Michele Garabedian Stork, Lisa Vodola, Sara Vicas, Krista Bixler
article en

Abstract

This design case describes how we integrated Generative AI (GenAI) into a doctoral-level instructional leadership course and how students used the tool in real time. We positioned GenAI as a design partner as students drafted communications, analyzed data, and navigated complex school scenarios. As the course unfolded, we documented how students’ use of GenAI shaped ongoing redesign decisions. Three moments drove major adjustments: students relied too heavily on polished AI language, accepted AI-generated data interpretations without critique, and struggled to articulate their values during simulated decision-making. We responded by revising prompts, adding structured reflection cues, and reframing GenAI to better support professional judgment. Our design case describes how GenAI can catalyze reflection rather than replace thinking, helping students test ideas, surface assumptions, and strengthen their leadership voice.

International Journal of Designs for LearningVol. 16(2)
Florida Gulf Coast University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.