Retrospective, Multicenter Study of Lacosamide to Treat Neonatal Seizures
ABSTRACT Objective Most antiseizure medications (ASMs) are prescribed off label for neonates. Lacosamide's efficacy in infants and availability in intravenous formulation suggest potential utility for neonates. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of lacosamide for neonatal seizures. Methods This 10‐center, retrospective study of neonates with seizures and lacosamide treatment initiated by ≤ 48 weeks postmenstrual age collected clinical data from medical records and electroencephalogram recordings. Lacosamide efficacy was determined by changes in seizure burden with lacosamide treatment and seizure cessation by hospital discharge. Potential adverse events were reviewed. Results Among 62 eligible neonates, 33 had acute provoked seizures while 29 had neonatal‐onset epilepsy; there was no difference in seizure type or baseline seizure severity between groups. There were high rates of pretreatment status epilepticus (48%) and treatment‐resistant seizures, with 93% receiving ≥ 3 ASMs before lacosamide. Most received intravenous lacosamide, with a median loading dose of 5.0 mg/kg and median daily dose of 7.3 mg/kg. Seizure cessation occurred in 37% of neonates; 21% had no additional ASM administered after lacosamide. Seizure burden, measured in seizure minutes per hour, was lower at both 4 h and 7 days following lacosamide administration. In addition, there was a median reduction in seizure frequency of 30 seizures per day at 7 and 30 days posttreatment ( p < .05). Lacosamide was continued at discharge in most neonates (72%). Seventy adverse events were reported in 35 (56%) neonates. Four transient events with possible or unknown relationship to lacosamide were likely multifactorial in origin; none were cardiac arrhythmias. Summary Despite high rates of treatment‐resistant seizures in this neonatal cohort, 37% experienced seizure cessation and most remained on lacosamide at hospital discharge. Most adverse events were not attributed to lacosamide. These results favor use of lacosamide and provide a rationale for future prospective studies.
Authors
- Andrea C. Pardo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7767-8539)
- Janet S. Soul (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6998-7753)
- Jessica R. Landers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9542-5612)
- Renée A. Shellhaas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3175-3908)
- Arnold J. Sansevere (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7805-8948)
- Nicholas S. Abend (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6166-2663)
- Sonya Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4429-0508)
- Giulia M. Benedetti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2917-4026)
- Andrew Knox (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7792-5384)
- Catherine J. Chu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7670-9313)
- Shavonne L. Massey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-221X)
- Cameron Thomas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1529-2846)
- Alexandra Santana Almansa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3550-1263)
- Bo Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1574-198X)
- Tammy N. Tsuchida
- Steffany Moen
Institutions
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- George Washington University Hospital (US)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Sanford Health (US)
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Children's National (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Lurie Children's Hospital (US)
- University of Minnesota Medical Center (US)
- C. S. Mott Children's Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Annals of the Child Neurology Society
- Published
- 2025-12-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cns3.70044
- Primary Topic
- Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00