Mapping the Situational Structure of Workplace Exploitation

Many people feel exploited at work. This negatively affects their motivation and productivity, thus leading to adverse outcomes for workers and employers. Whereas past research on workplace exploitation has largely focused on its consequences, less is known about when it occurs. In this paper, we use interdependence theory to study which workplace relations are perceived as exploitative and by whom. We collect representative observational data on perceptions of interdependence in real-life interactions in which exploitation occurred in the workplace. In addition, we experimentally test for the direction of causality between perceived interdependence structure and affordance of exploitation. We find that perceived exploitation is widespread and that exploitative situations share a common interdependence structure. Herein, workers' lack of power over their own outcomes acts a key driver of exploitation affordance. Thus, while exploitative behavior may manifest very differently across diverse workplace settings, we uncover that people perceive exploitative interactions in very similar ways. Our findings advance research on exploitation in the workplace but have practical relevance too: understanding common structures of exploitative situations facilitates their identification and mitigation. Thus, our results provide guidance for organizations aiming to restructure workplaces at risk of exploitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CrimRxiv
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.62a11f9c
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Situational Structure of Workplace Exploitation

Maximilian Schmitt, Cátia P. Teixeira, Hannes Rusch, Julia Teufel
CrimRxiv
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Mapping the Situational Structure of Workplace Exploitation

Maximilian Schmitt, Cátia P. Teixeira, Hannes Rusch, Julia Teufel
article en

Abstract

Many people feel exploited at work. This negatively affects their motivation and productivity, thus leading to adverse outcomes for workers and employers. Whereas past research on workplace exploitation has largely focused on its consequences, less is known about when it occurs. In this paper, we use interdependence theory to study which workplace relations are perceived as exploitative and by whom. We collect representative observational data on perceptions of interdependence in real-life interactions in which exploitation occurred in the workplace. In addition, we experimentally test for the direction of causality between perceived interdependence structure and affordance of exploitation. We find that perceived exploitation is widespread and that exploitative situations share a common interdependence structure. Herein, workers' lack of power over their own outcomes acts a key driver of exploitation affordance. Thus, while exploitative behavior may manifest very differently across diverse workplace settings, we uncover that people perceive exploitative interactions in very similar ways. Our findings advance research on exploitation in the workplace but have practical relevance too: understanding common structures of exploitative situations facilitates their identification and mitigation. Thus, our results provide guidance for organizations aiming to restructure workplaces at risk of exploitation.

CrimRxiv
Maastricht University (NL), Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.