City Slicker or Country Bumpkin?—Distinguishing Urban and Rural Residents From Subtle Facial Cues

ABSTRACT Stereotypes characterize urban and rural residents as differing in traits, values and social outcomes. Here, we examined how people's stereotypes about urban and rural residents differ, testing their validity using a lens model. Results showed that participants detected whether people resided in urban or rural areas from photos across three nations: the United States, Canada and Japan. North American and Japanese participants shared similar stereotypes of urban residents, seeing them as more likely to appear competent, dominant and positive in affect than rural residents. Yet, whereas inferences of competence, dominance, attractiveness and perceived age explained accurate urban–rural judgements in North America, only perceived age explained accurate urban–rural judgements in Japan. Together, these findings illuminate how both diagnostic and misleading social trait expectations account for differences in social perception across cultures, contributing to an ecologically functional account of social perception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70042
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

City Slicker or Country Bumpkin?—Distinguishing Urban and Rural Residents From Subtle Facial Cues

Laura Tian, Nicholas O. Rule, McLean G. Morgan
European Journal of Social Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

City Slicker or Country Bumpkin?—Distinguishing Urban and Rural Residents From Subtle Facial Cues

Laura Tian, Nicholas O. Rule, McLean G. Morgan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Stereotypes characterize urban and rural residents as differing in traits, values and social outcomes. Here, we examined how people's stereotypes about urban and rural residents differ, testing their validity using a lens model. Results showed that participants detected whether people resided in urban or rural areas from photos across three nations: the United States, Canada and Japan. North American and Japanese participants shared similar stereotypes of urban residents, seeing them as more likely to appear competent, dominant and positive in affect than rural residents. Yet, whereas inferences of competence, dominance, attractiveness and perceived age explained accurate urban–rural judgements in North America, only perceived age explained accurate urban–rural judgements in Japan. Together, these findings illuminate how both diagnostic and misleading social trait expectations account for differences in social perception across cultures, contributing to an ecologically functional account of social perception.

European Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 56(2)
University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.