Correlation for Transitional Reynolds Number and Assessment of RANS for Bypass Transition

Abstract Direct numerical simulations (DNSs) of bypass transition are performed for zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layers with inlet freestream turbulence intensity (FSTI) ranging from 0.75% to 6%. The DNS database exhibits excellent agreement with the Blasius solution in the laminar region, with deviation occurring only near transition onset, providing improved fidelity compared to previous computational studies. A novel skin-friction-based intermittency definition is proposed and validated against conventional temporal intermittency measurements, demonstrating equivalent transition prediction capability without requiring time-resolved data. Using this definition, a new transition Reynolds number correlation is developed that incorporates the effects of FSTI, turbulent length scales, and intermittency threshold. The correlation reduces to the classical Abu-Ghannam and Shaw formulation at zero intermittency and achieves 16.2% average error when validated against independent experimental data from Fransson and Shahinfar (2020). Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations using the k−ω shear-stress transport (SST) and γ−Reθ transition models reveal significant sensitivity to inlet length scale specification, with integral length scale predictions deviating from DNS in both pretransitional and transitional regions. The transported intermittency in RANS shows wall-normal-dependent transition onset that differs from the skin-friction-based definition. This comprehensive DNS database and associated correlations provide improved benchmarks for transition model development and validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluids Engineering
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4070700
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation for Transitional Reynolds Number and Assessment of RANS for Bypass Transition

Rahul Agrawal, Xiaohua Wu, Carlos A. Gonzalez
Journal of Fluids Engineering
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
article

Correlation for Transitional Reynolds Number and Assessment of RANS for Bypass Transition

Rahul Agrawal, Xiaohua Wu, Carlos A. Gonzalez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Direct numerical simulations (DNSs) of bypass transition are performed for zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layers with inlet freestream turbulence intensity (FSTI) ranging from 0.75% to 6%. The DNS database exhibits excellent agreement with the Blasius solution in the laminar region, with deviation occurring only near transition onset, providing improved fidelity compared to previous computational studies. A novel skin-friction-based intermittency definition is proposed and validated against conventional temporal intermittency measurements, demonstrating equivalent transition prediction capability without requiring time-resolved data. Using this definition, a new transition Reynolds number correlation is developed that incorporates the effects of FSTI, turbulent length scales, and intermittency threshold. The correlation reduces to the classical Abu-Ghannam and Shaw formulation at zero intermittency and achieves 16.2% average error when validated against independent experimental data from Fransson and Shahinfar (2020). Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations using the k−ω shear-stress transport (SST) and γ−Reθ transition models reveal significant sensitivity to inlet length scale specification, with integral length scale predictions deviating from DNS in both pretransitional and transitional regions. The transported intermittency in RANS shows wall-normal-dependent transition onset that differs from the skin-friction-based definition. This comprehensive DNS database and associated correlations provide improved benchmarks for transition model development and validation.

Journal of Fluids EngineeringVol. 148(4)
Royal Military College of Canada (CA), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.