Toward Cobalt-Free SOC Stacks: Comparative Study of (Mn,Cu,Fe)3O4 vs. (Mn,Co)2O4 Spinels as Protective Coatings for SOFC Interconnects

The paper presents the experimental results of applying a novel protective coating made from Mn1.7Cu1.3-xFexO4, compared to commercial spinels Mn1.5Co1.5O4 and MnCo2O4, as a key component responsible for preventing chromium diffusion and slowing the increase in area-specific resistance (ASR) in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs). The layers of selected materials were deposited on Crofer 22APU steel by electrophoretic deposition (EPD) on small samples and by roll painting on full-scale interconnects. The coatings were evaluated by measuring the ASR of small samples for short and long runs (1000 h), as well as real-scale interconnects assembled in a SOFC stack composed of three cells, measuring 11 × 11 cm2, which operated for 1000 h at 670 °C. The collected data on the electrochemical performance of the stack allowed for estimation of the degradation rates of all the repeating units, revealing benefits from using (Mn,Cu,Fe)3O4 as a coating. The results are compared to the literature reports. Post-mortem analysis by the SEM-EDS technique allowed for investigation of Cr diffusion levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010011
Primary Topic
Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Cobalt-Free SOC Stacks: Comparative Study of (Mn,Cu,Fe)3O4 vs. (Mn,Co)2O4 Spinels as Protective Coatings for SOFC Interconnects

E.N. Naumovich, Magdalena Kosiorek, Leszek Ajdys, Piotr Jasiński et al.
Energies
Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
article

Toward Cobalt-Free SOC Stacks: Comparative Study of (Mn,Cu,Fe)3O4 vs. (Mn,Co)2O4 Spinels as Protective Coatings for SOFC Interconnects

E.N. Naumovich, Magdalena Kosiorek, Leszek Ajdys, Piotr Jasiński, Agnieszka Żurawska, Sebastian Molin, Marek Skrzypkiewicz, Justyna Ignaczak, Michał Wierzbicki
article en

Abstract

The paper presents the experimental results of applying a novel protective coating made from Mn1.7Cu1.3-xFexO4, compared to commercial spinels Mn1.5Co1.5O4 and MnCo2O4, as a key component responsible for preventing chromium diffusion and slowing the increase in area-specific resistance (ASR) in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs). The layers of selected materials were deposited on Crofer 22APU steel by electrophoretic deposition (EPD) on small samples and by roll painting on full-scale interconnects. The coatings were evaluated by measuring the ASR of small samples for short and long runs (1000 h), as well as real-scale interconnects assembled in a SOFC stack composed of three cells, measuring 11 × 11 cm2, which operated for 1000 h at 670 °C. The collected data on the electrochemical performance of the stack allowed for estimation of the degradation rates of all the repeating units, revealing benefits from using (Mn,Cu,Fe)3O4 as a coating. The results are compared to the literature reports. Post-mortem analysis by the SEM-EDS technique allowed for investigation of Cr diffusion levels.

EnergiesVol. 19(1)
Gdańsk University of Technology (PL), Institute of Power Engineering (PL)
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward Cobalt-Free SOC Stacks: Comparative Study of (Mn,Cu,Fe)3O4 vs. (Mn,Co)2O4 Spinels as Protective Coatings for SOFC Interconnects — E.N. Naumovich, Magdalena Kosiorek, et al. · Energies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS