Reintroduced Grey Crowned Cranes (Balearica regulorum) Exhibit Reduced Dispersal and Smaller Home Ranges than Wild Conspecifics in Rwanda

Reintroductions are essential in wildlife conservation, but their success depends not only on demographic outcomes such as survival and reproduction, but also on behavioral adjustments that determine integration into the wild. The Grey Crowned Crane (<i>Balearica regulorum</i>), an endangered species, has suffered dramatic declines due to habitat loss, disturbance, and illegal capture. In Rwanda, a large-scale amnesty rescued 242 cranes from captivity, with 166 rehabilitated and released into Akagera National Park. This study used GPS-GSM telemetry to investigate post-release movement of reintroduced captive-rescued cranes in comparison with wild individuals. Twenty-one cranes (10 reintroduced, 11 wild) were tracked for 5-1118 days, with 15 individuals meeting criteria for detailed analyses. Reintroduced cranes exhibited reduced dispersal, with only 2 of 7 dispersing compared to 7 of 9 wild cranes, and typically after much longer residence at the release site. Reintroduced cranes also had smaller maximum displacements (median 8.4 km) and smaller home ranges (median 3.3 km<sup>2</sup>) relative to those of wild cranes (median 24.0 km and median 22.6 km<sup>2</sup>, respectively). These findings suggest that supplemental feeding and extended captivity (2 days to 10 years) of reintroduced cranes strongly influenced their high site fidelity and movement patterns. While limited dispersal may benefit short-term survival, long-term monitoring of survival, reproduction, and demographic trends is critical for assessing whether reintroduction achieves population recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16010006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reintroduced Grey Crowned Cranes (Balearica regulorum) Exhibit Reduced Dispersal and Smaller Home Ranges than Wild Conspecifics in Rwanda

Jean Ferus Niyomwungeri, Richard Muvunyi, Olivier Nsengimana, Déo Ruhagazi et al.
1 citations
Animals
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
1.72
article

Reintroduced Grey Crowned Cranes (Balearica regulorum) Exhibit Reduced Dispersal and Smaller Home Ranges than Wild Conspecifics in Rwanda

Jean Ferus Niyomwungeri, Richard Muvunyi, Olivier Nsengimana, Déo Ruhagazi, Curtice R. Griffin, Placide Masengesho, Laura E. Peirson, Bernard Ndayisaba, Kirsten Szala-Krotkov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Reintroductions are essential in wildlife conservation, but their success depends not only on demographic outcomes such as survival and reproduction, but also on behavioral adjustments that determine integration into the wild. The Grey Crowned Crane (<i>Balearica regulorum</i>), an endangered species, has suffered dramatic declines due to habitat loss, disturbance, and illegal capture. In Rwanda, a large-scale amnesty rescued 242 cranes from captivity, with 166 rehabilitated and released into Akagera National Park. This study used GPS-GSM telemetry to investigate post-release movement of reintroduced captive-rescued cranes in comparison with wild individuals. Twenty-one cranes (10 reintroduced, 11 wild) were tracked for 5-1118 days, with 15 individuals meeting criteria for detailed analyses. Reintroduced cranes exhibited reduced dispersal, with only 2 of 7 dispersing compared to 7 of 9 wild cranes, and typically after much longer residence at the release site. Reintroduced cranes also had smaller maximum displacements (median 8.4 km) and smaller home ranges (median 3.3 km<sup>2</sup>) relative to those of wild cranes (median 24.0 km and median 22.6 km<sup>2</sup>, respectively). These findings suggest that supplemental feeding and extended captivity (2 days to 10 years) of reintroduced cranes strongly influenced their high site fidelity and movement patterns. While limited dispersal may benefit short-term survival, long-term monitoring of survival, reproduction, and demographic trends is critical for assessing whether reintroduction achieves population recovery.

AnimalsVol. 16(1)
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Columbus Zoo and Aquarium (US), Rwanda Wildlife Conservation Association (RW), Rwanda Development Board (RW)
National Geographic Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.