Partial intracranial volumes in metopic synostosis – pre- and postoperative comparisons with healthy controls

Surgical intervention for metopic synostosis has been much debated but aims to correct trigonocephaly and hypotelorism while ensuring enough space for undisturbed brain growth. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in partial intracranial volumes and the interfrontal angle following fronto-orbital advancement. Twenty-six non-syndromic metopic synostosis patients treated with fronto-orbital advancement at Uppsala University Hospital between 2012 and 2022 who had undergone computed tomography preoperatively and at age three were included, as well as 40 age- and sex-matched controls who had undergone computed tomography for post-traumatic evaluation. Demographic information, imaging, pre-, peri-, and postoperative data were collected. The frontal-, middle-, and posterior intracranial volume and their relative distribution were calculated in the softwares Craniosyn and ITK-SNAP 3.8.0. Preoperatively, patients had smaller interfrontal angles (p < 0.001), total intracranial volumes (p = 0.03), and frontal volumes (p = 0.02), compared with controls. At age three, the total intracranial volume (p = 0.96) and frontal volume (p = 0.51) did not differ significantly between patients and controls, whereas the interfrontal angle remained smaller in the synostosis group (p < 0.001). The relative intracranial volume distribution between frontal-, middle-, and posterior volumes did not match the distribution in healthy controls pre- or postoperatively, where the middle volume ratio was notably greater, and both the frontal- and posterior volume ratios were smaller in patients. Fronto-orbital advancement and subsequent growth improve the total- and partial intracranial volume in metopic synostosis to match the volumes of healthy controls at age three but does not restore the relative intracranial volume distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.44913
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partial intracranial volumes in metopic synostosis – pre- and postoperative comparisons with healthy controls

Daniel Nowinski, Hanna Lif, Rehan Chakari, Per Enblad
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

Partial intracranial volumes in metopic synostosis – pre- and postoperative comparisons with healthy controls

Daniel Nowinski, Hanna Lif, Rehan Chakari, Per Enblad
article en

Abstract

Surgical intervention for metopic synostosis has been much debated but aims to correct trigonocephaly and hypotelorism while ensuring enough space for undisturbed brain growth. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in partial intracranial volumes and the interfrontal angle following fronto-orbital advancement. Twenty-six non-syndromic metopic synostosis patients treated with fronto-orbital advancement at Uppsala University Hospital between 2012 and 2022 who had undergone computed tomography preoperatively and at age three were included, as well as 40 age- and sex-matched controls who had undergone computed tomography for post-traumatic evaluation. Demographic information, imaging, pre-, peri-, and postoperative data were collected. The frontal-, middle-, and posterior intracranial volume and their relative distribution were calculated in the softwares Craniosyn and ITK-SNAP 3.8.0. Preoperatively, patients had smaller interfrontal angles (p < 0.001), total intracranial volumes (p = 0.03), and frontal volumes (p = 0.02), compared with controls. At age three, the total intracranial volume (p = 0.96) and frontal volume (p = 0.51) did not differ significantly between patients and controls, whereas the interfrontal angle remained smaller in the synostosis group (p < 0.001). The relative intracranial volume distribution between frontal-, middle-, and posterior volumes did not match the distribution in healthy controls pre- or postoperatively, where the middle volume ratio was notably greater, and both the frontal- and posterior volume ratios were smaller in patients. Fronto-orbital advancement and subsequent growth improve the total- and partial intracranial volume in metopic synostosis to match the volumes of healthy controls at age three but does not restore the relative intracranial volume distribution.

Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand SurgeryVol. 60
Uppsala University (SE)
Region Uppsala
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.