Navigating qualitative methods choices in dissemination and implementation research

Qualitative methods are critical to the conduct of Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research because they illuminate processes, relationships, contexts, and other phenomena known to influence implementation and dissemination. Given the multitude of methods available, choosing appropriate and feasible methods can be challenging, leading many to rely on a limited set of methods. Navigational assistance with methods decision-making, including choosing to use less common methods, is lacking. This paper outlines how to select study methods, beginning with the research goal and the type of research question(s), and presents methods options based on key characteristics of the research. Decision pathways and considerations important to decision-making are featured as well as brief descriptions of the main methods available. Examples are also presented for instructional purposes. This paper supports the field of D&I by addressing a gap in the existing literature about how to conduct qualitative methods D&I research from a methodological perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-025-01476-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating qualitative methods choices in dissemination and implementation research

Jodi Summers Holtrop, Brooke Dorsey-Holliman, Alison Brown
1 citations
Implementation Science
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
article

Navigating qualitative methods choices in dissemination and implementation research

Jodi Summers Holtrop, Brooke Dorsey-Holliman, Alison Brown
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Qualitative methods are critical to the conduct of Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research because they illuminate processes, relationships, contexts, and other phenomena known to influence implementation and dissemination. Given the multitude of methods available, choosing appropriate and feasible methods can be challenging, leading many to rely on a limited set of methods. Navigational assistance with methods decision-making, including choosing to use less common methods, is lacking. This paper outlines how to select study methods, beginning with the research goal and the type of research question(s), and presents methods options based on key characteristics of the research. Decision pathways and considerations important to decision-making are featured as well as brief descriptions of the main methods available. Examples are also presented for instructional purposes. This paper supports the field of D&I by addressing a gap in the existing literature about how to conduct qualitative methods D&I research from a methodological perspective.

Implementation ScienceVol. 21(1)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Outcomes Research Consortium (US), Neurobehavioral Systems (US), Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior (US), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating qualitative methods choices in dissemination and implementation research — Jodi Summers Holtrop, Brooke Dorsey-Holliman, et al. · Implementation Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS