Students as carbon accountants: calculating carbon costs of a PhD in neuroscience

Research is an energy- and resource-demanding activity. However, despite emerging sustainability initiatives, a paucity of data and uptake of green initiatives continue to hamper effective and accountable emissions mitigation. Worldwide, >250,000 doctoral students graduate annually across all academic disciplines. Empowering students to engage in carbon accounting can raise awareness of sustainability in research and provide a substantial and robust resource of carbon data alongside a powerful community-driven impetus for decarbonization. Here, we demonstrate how students and other researchers can consistently measure the carbon footprint of their work, using 1 PhD student's research in a Drosophila neuroscience lab as our case study. We present a life cycle assessment of the equivalent carbon dioxide emissions generated by the student's research activities. Moreover, we explain how students can create a "carbon appendix' to their research, as a common framework for disseminating carbon data and revealed strategies for improving research sustainability. We argue that the process of creating a carbon appendix can empower researchers to scrutinize sustainability practices, empower them to implement effective green initiatives, and identify data-driven solutions to meet and exceed funders' sustainability targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genetics
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf268
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students as carbon accountants: calculating carbon costs of a PhD in neuroscience

Ratna Sircar, A. Bebbington, Malte C. Gather, Stefan R. Pulver et al.
1 citations
Genetics
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
2.82
article

Students as carbon accountants: calculating carbon costs of a PhD in neuroscience

Ratna Sircar, A. Bebbington, Malte C. Gather, Stefan R. Pulver, William V. Smith
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research is an energy- and resource-demanding activity. However, despite emerging sustainability initiatives, a paucity of data and uptake of green initiatives continue to hamper effective and accountable emissions mitigation. Worldwide, >250,000 doctoral students graduate annually across all academic disciplines. Empowering students to engage in carbon accounting can raise awareness of sustainability in research and provide a substantial and robust resource of carbon data alongside a powerful community-driven impetus for decarbonization. Here, we demonstrate how students and other researchers can consistently measure the carbon footprint of their work, using 1 PhD student's research in a Drosophila neuroscience lab as our case study. We present a life cycle assessment of the equivalent carbon dioxide emissions generated by the student's research activities. Moreover, we explain how students can create a "carbon appendix' to their research, as a common framework for disseminating carbon data and revealed strategies for improving research sustainability. We argue that the process of creating a carbon appendix can empower researchers to scrutinize sustainability practices, empower them to implement effective green initiatives, and identify data-driven solutions to meet and exceed funders' sustainability targets.

GeneticsVol. 232(2)
Andrews University (US), St. Andrews University (US), University of St Andrews (GB), University of Cologne (DE)
Emory University, UK Research and Innovation, University of St Andrews, Universität zu Köln, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Directorate for Biological Sciences, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.