New Genre Developments in Autobiographical Buddhist Literature

This book review essay explores two works that examine new hybrid genres of Western Buddhist autobiographical writing: John D. Barbour’s Journeys of Transformation (2022) and Ben Van Overmeire’s American Koan (2024). In Barbour’s exploration of Western Buddhist travel narratives and Van Overmeire’s examination of American Zen autobiographies based on koan, the scholars face an inherent paradox: Buddhist doctrine teaches no-self, yet autobiographical narratives are fundamentally self-centered. Both scholars demonstrate that Western Buddhist autobiographical narratives succeed precisely by refusing to resolve this tension. This essay examines how both scholars define these emerging genres, explains how they navigate narrating self-dissolution, and assesses how they survey the ways in which marginalized authors strategically foreground oppressed identities as a necessary foundation for spiritual transformation. Barbour and Van Overmeire illuminate how genre innovation serves both literary and soteriological purposes, while broadening the study of Buddhism, as well as religion and literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Buddhism
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26034/lu.jgb.2025.4050
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Genre Developments in Autobiographical Buddhist Literature

Kimberly Beek
Journal of Global Buddhism
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

New Genre Developments in Autobiographical Buddhist Literature

Kimberly Beek
article en

Abstract

This book review essay explores two works that examine new hybrid genres of Western Buddhist autobiographical writing: John D. Barbour’s Journeys of Transformation (2022) and Ben Van Overmeire’s American Koan (2024). In Barbour’s exploration of Western Buddhist travel narratives and Van Overmeire’s examination of American Zen autobiographies based on koan, the scholars face an inherent paradox: Buddhist doctrine teaches no-self, yet autobiographical narratives are fundamentally self-centered. Both scholars demonstrate that Western Buddhist autobiographical narratives succeed precisely by refusing to resolve this tension. This essay examines how both scholars define these emerging genres, explains how they navigate narrating self-dissolution, and assesses how they survey the ways in which marginalized authors strategically foreground oppressed identities as a necessary foundation for spiritual transformation. Barbour and Van Overmeire illuminate how genre innovation serves both literary and soteriological purposes, while broadening the study of Buddhism, as well as religion and literature.

Journal of Global BuddhismVol. 26(1)
Ronin Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

New Genre Developments in Autobiographical Buddhist Literature — Kimberly Beek · Journal of Global Buddhism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS