High‐Strain‐Rate Response and Microstructural Evolution of Additively Manufactured A286 Steel Lattice Structures: A Multiscale Experimental Investigation

This study investigates the high‐strain‐rate response and microstructural evolution of additively manufactured A286 steel lattice structures with body‐centered cubic (BCC), honeycomb, and gyroid architectures. The lattices, produced via powder bed fusion–laser melting, are characterized through quasistatic compression, split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing, and advanced material analyses including thermogravimetric‐differential thermal analysis, Fourier transform infrared, X‐ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and residual stress evaluation. Under quasistatic compression, the honeycomb lattice exhibits the highest peak stress (≈3200 MPa), exceeding the BCC (≈2100 MPa) and gyroid (≈1500 MPa) configurations. SHPB tests reveal that the honeycomb maintains lower strain rates (≈1200 s −1 at 6 bar) and minimal deformation, confirming superior dynamic stability. Despite its lower energy absorption (≈4.95 J), it demonstrates enhanced impact resistance due to retained compressive residual stress (−628 MPa) and improved stress redistribution. Finite element simulations corroborate experimental results, validating stress evolution and deformation trends. SEM and XRD analyses confirm that the honeycomb lattice resists fracture and maintains phase stability under high‐strain‐rate loading. These findings identify the honeycomb lattice as an optimal design for underbody blast protection in armored fighting vehicles, combining stiffness, resilience, and superior structural integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202501983
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High‐Strain‐Rate Response and Microstructural Evolution of Additively Manufactured A286 Steel Lattice Structures: A Multiscale Experimental Investigation

Shaik Ameer Malik, J. Krishnaiah, Suryakumar Simhambhatla, C. Chandrasekhara Sastry et al.
2 citations
Advanced Engineering Materials
Cellular and Composite Structures
1.43
article

High‐Strain‐Rate Response and Microstructural Evolution of Additively Manufactured A286 Steel Lattice Structures: A Multiscale Experimental Investigation

Shaik Ameer Malik, J. Krishnaiah, Suryakumar Simhambhatla, C. Chandrasekhara Sastry, V B Brahmadathan, C. Lakshmana Rao, Bobbili Veera Siva Reddy, Arif Rahman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the high‐strain‐rate response and microstructural evolution of additively manufactured A286 steel lattice structures with body‐centered cubic (BCC), honeycomb, and gyroid architectures. The lattices, produced via powder bed fusion–laser melting, are characterized through quasistatic compression, split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing, and advanced material analyses including thermogravimetric‐differential thermal analysis, Fourier transform infrared, X‐ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and residual stress evaluation. Under quasistatic compression, the honeycomb lattice exhibits the highest peak stress (≈3200 MPa), exceeding the BCC (≈2100 MPa) and gyroid (≈1500 MPa) configurations. SHPB tests reveal that the honeycomb maintains lower strain rates (≈1200 s −1 at 6 bar) and minimal deformation, confirming superior dynamic stability. Despite its lower energy absorption (≈4.95 J), it demonstrates enhanced impact resistance due to retained compressive residual stress (−628 MPa) and improved stress redistribution. Finite element simulations corroborate experimental results, validating stress evolution and deformation trends. SEM and XRD analyses confirm that the honeycomb lattice resists fracture and maintains phase stability under high‐strain‐rate loading. These findings identify the honeycomb lattice as an optimal design for underbody blast protection in armored fighting vehicles, combining stiffness, resilience, and superior structural integrity.

Advanced Engineering MaterialsVol. 28(3)
Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN), Combat Vehicles Research and Development Establishment (IN), Kurnool Medical College (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cellular and Composite Structures
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.