Influences of Dispersal and Environmental Selection on Zooplankton Distributions Across the Upper 1000 m of the North Pacific

ABSTRACT Aim Test the response of mesopelagic zooplankton community composition and distributional ranges to dispersal potential and environment, in comparison with the epipelagic zooplankton community. Location Epipelagic (0–200 m) and mesopelagic (200–1000 m) depth zones of the North Pacific Ocean. Taxon Multicellular zooplankton. Methods Metabarcoding of two molecular markers (18S and COI) in combination with a global ocean circulation model, analysed by General Dissimilarity Modelling. Results We found no significant difference in beta‐diversity across three depth strata (0–200, 200–500, and 500–1000 m), calculated from the nMDS dispersion of samples within each stratum. Similarity in beta‐diversity within the three depth strata indicates that epipelagic and mesopelagic zooplankton communities have similar levels of spatial turnover in species composition despite differences in the magnitude of environmental gradients and dispersal potential. There were no differences in the biogeographic ranges of taxa associated with each depth zone, but we observed larger temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen habitat envelopes as well as narrower potential food ranges for deeper‐dwelling taxa. Ocean basin‐scale community dissimilarity was correlated with dispersal distance, as well as with changes in temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen concentration, and food flux. Combined Generalised Dissimilarity Models incorporating both dispersal potential and environmental habitat variables revealed that the environmental variables temperature and food flux had the strongest predictive power to explain community dissimilarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biogeography
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.70115
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influences of Dispersal and Environmental Selection on Zooplankton Distributions Across the Upper 1000 m of the North Pacific

Stephanie A. Matthews, Jennifer M. Questel, Mark D. Ohman, Leocadio Blanco‐Bercial et al.
Journal of Biogeography
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Influences of Dispersal and Environmental Selection on Zooplankton Distributions Across the Upper 1000 m of the North Pacific

Stephanie A. Matthews, Jennifer M. Questel, Mark D. Ohman, Leocadio Blanco‐Bercial, Junya Hirai, Alexus E. Cazares‐Nuesser, Katarina Kaminsky
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Test the response of mesopelagic zooplankton community composition and distributional ranges to dispersal potential and environment, in comparison with the epipelagic zooplankton community. Location Epipelagic (0–200 m) and mesopelagic (200–1000 m) depth zones of the North Pacific Ocean. Taxon Multicellular zooplankton. Methods Metabarcoding of two molecular markers (18S and COI) in combination with a global ocean circulation model, analysed by General Dissimilarity Modelling. Results We found no significant difference in beta‐diversity across three depth strata (0–200, 200–500, and 500–1000 m), calculated from the nMDS dispersion of samples within each stratum. Similarity in beta‐diversity within the three depth strata indicates that epipelagic and mesopelagic zooplankton communities have similar levels of spatial turnover in species composition despite differences in the magnitude of environmental gradients and dispersal potential. There were no differences in the biogeographic ranges of taxa associated with each depth zone, but we observed larger temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen habitat envelopes as well as narrower potential food ranges for deeper‐dwelling taxa. Ocean basin‐scale community dissimilarity was correlated with dispersal distance, as well as with changes in temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen concentration, and food flux. Combined Generalised Dissimilarity Models incorporating both dispersal potential and environmental habitat variables revealed that the environmental variables temperature and food flux had the strongest predictive power to explain community dissimilarity.

Journal of BiogeographyVol. 53(1)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences (BM), University of Alaska Fairbanks (US), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), University of San Diego (US), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.