Why AI might not gain moral standing: lessons from animal ethics

Abstract In recent years there has been a growing interest in the notion of AI consciousness—the question of whether artificial intelligences (AIs) can be conscious, and under what conditions this might emerge. This interest extends beyond academia to industry and the media. question of AI consciousness is underpinned by a moral question: should conscious AIs be granted moral standing? Emerging philosophical literature has begun to explore these ideas. We argue that these discussions neglect relevant psychological literature that can inform another element of this question—how our social and cognitive biases may impact our willingness to ascribe moral standing to AIs. In the current paper, we draw on the literature that examines moral consideration for non-human animals, and argue that similar biases limit moral standing for AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00919-x
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why AI might not gain moral standing: lessons from animal ethics

Ali Ladak, Matti Wilks, Steve Loughnan
AI and Ethics
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Why AI might not gain moral standing: lessons from animal ethics

Ali Ladak, Matti Wilks, Steve Loughnan
article en

Abstract

Abstract In recent years there has been a growing interest in the notion of AI consciousness—the question of whether artificial intelligences (AIs) can be conscious, and under what conditions this might emerge. This interest extends beyond academia to industry and the media. question of AI consciousness is underpinned by a moral question: should conscious AIs be granted moral standing? Emerging philosophical literature has begun to explore these ideas. We argue that these discussions neglect relevant psychological literature that can inform another element of this question—how our social and cognitive biases may impact our willingness to ascribe moral standing to AIs. In the current paper, we draw on the literature that examines moral consideration for non-human animals, and argue that similar biases limit moral standing for AI.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(1)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.