Is AI only to Blame? Assessing Teachers’ Perceived Challenges in AI Detectability

Existing research on teachers’ ability to detect AI-generated texts has predominantly emphasized technical shortcomings, overlooking the behavioral and environmental factors that shape detection accuracy. As generative AI becomes embedded in education, understanding how institutional and personal contexts influence teachers’ detection performance is crucial for ensuring academic integrity. This study aims to identify and analyze the key internal (behavioral) and external (institutional and contextual) factors affecting teachers’ ability to distinguish AI-generated from human-written texts. It further seeks to examine how these factors interact across global regions to develop a more comprehensive framework for understanding detection challenges. An exploratory sequential mixed-method design was employed. The first phase involved 15 key informant interviews with educators from three continents to identify salient determinants of detection capability. Insights from this phase guided the development of a survey administered to 317 teachers across four continents. Data was analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test interrelationships among identified factors. Findings revealed that rigid university policies significantly hinder teachers’ detection ability, especially in Europe, both directly and indirectly through time limitations and content indistinguishability. By integrating behavioral and contextual dimensions, the study advances beyond technically centered perspectives and proposes a global framework for understanding AI detectability. The results have theoretical and practical implications for policymakers and AI developers. Limitations include reliance on perception-based data and lack of African representation, warranting broader, experimental validation in future research.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol15.2.2.2025
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is AI only to Blame? Assessing Teachers’ Perceived Challenges in AI Detectability

Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Is AI only to Blame? Assessing Teachers’ Perceived Challenges in AI Detectability

article en

Abstract

Existing research on teachers’ ability to detect AI-generated texts has predominantly emphasized technical shortcomings, overlooking the behavioral and environmental factors that shape detection accuracy. As generative AI becomes embedded in education, understanding how institutional and personal contexts influence teachers’ detection performance is crucial for ensuring academic integrity. This study aims to identify and analyze the key internal (behavioral) and external (institutional and contextual) factors affecting teachers’ ability to distinguish AI-generated from human-written texts. It further seeks to examine how these factors interact across global regions to develop a more comprehensive framework for understanding detection challenges. An exploratory sequential mixed-method design was employed. The first phase involved 15 key informant interviews with educators from three continents to identify salient determinants of detection capability. Insights from this phase guided the development of a survey administered to 317 teachers across four continents. Data was analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test interrelationships among identified factors. Findings revealed that rigid university policies significantly hinder teachers’ detection ability, especially in Europe, both directly and indirectly through time limitations and content indistinguishability. By integrating behavioral and contextual dimensions, the study advances beyond technically centered perspectives and proposes a global framework for understanding AI detectability. The results have theoretical and practical implications for policymakers and AI developers. Limitations include reliance on perception-based data and lack of African representation, warranting broader, experimental validation in future research.

Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and LearningVol. 15(2)
Georgia State University (US), East West University (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.