Performance Assessment of Satellite-Based Rainfall Products in the Abbay Basin, Ethiopia

Satellite-based rainfall products (SRPs) are indispensable for hydro-climatological research, particularly in data-limited environments such as Ethiopia. This study systematically evaluates the performance of three widely used SRPs: Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data version 2 (CHIRPS), Tropical Applications of Meteorology using Satellite and ground-based observations version 3.1 (TAMSAT), and Multi-Source Weighted Ensemble Precipitation version 2.8 (MSWEP) across the North and South Gojjam sub-basins of the Abbay Basin. Using ground observations as benchmarks, spatial and temporal accuracy was assessed under varying elevation and rainfall intensity conditions, employing bias decomposition, error analysis, and detection metrics. Results show that rainfall variability in the region is shaped more by the local climate and topography than elevation, with elevation alone proving a weak predictor (R2 < 0.5). Among the products, MSWEP v2.8 demonstrated the highest daily rainfall detection skill (≈ 87–88%), followed by TAMSAT (≈78%), while CHIRPS detected only about half of rainfall events (≈54%) and tended to overestimate no-rain days. MSWEP’s error composition is dominated by low random error (~52%), though it slightly overestimates rainfall and rainy days. TAMSAT provides finer-resolution data that capture localized variability and dry conditions well, with the lowest false alarm rate and moderate random error (~59%). CHIRPS exhibits weaker daily performance, dominated by high random error (~66%) and missed bias, though it improves at monthly scales and better captures heavy and violent rainfall. Seasonally, SRPs reproduce MAM rainfall reasonably well across both sub-basins, but their performance deteriorates markedly in JJAS, particularly in the south. These findings highlight the importance of sub-basin scale analysis and demonstrate that random versus systematic error composition is critical for understanding product reliability. The results provide practical guidance for selecting and calibrating SRPs in mountainous regions, supporting improved water resource management, climate impact assessment, and hydrological modeling in data-scarce environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18010002
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Assessment of Satellite-Based Rainfall Products in the Abbay Basin, Ethiopia

Assefa Mekonnen Melesse, Brook Abate, Tadela Terefe Gashaw
Remote Sensing
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
article

Performance Assessment of Satellite-Based Rainfall Products in the Abbay Basin, Ethiopia

Assefa Mekonnen Melesse, Brook Abate, Tadela Terefe Gashaw
article en

Abstract

Satellite-based rainfall products (SRPs) are indispensable for hydro-climatological research, particularly in data-limited environments such as Ethiopia. This study systematically evaluates the performance of three widely used SRPs: Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data version 2 (CHIRPS), Tropical Applications of Meteorology using Satellite and ground-based observations version 3.1 (TAMSAT), and Multi-Source Weighted Ensemble Precipitation version 2.8 (MSWEP) across the North and South Gojjam sub-basins of the Abbay Basin. Using ground observations as benchmarks, spatial and temporal accuracy was assessed under varying elevation and rainfall intensity conditions, employing bias decomposition, error analysis, and detection metrics. Results show that rainfall variability in the region is shaped more by the local climate and topography than elevation, with elevation alone proving a weak predictor (R2 < 0.5). Among the products, MSWEP v2.8 demonstrated the highest daily rainfall detection skill (≈ 87–88%), followed by TAMSAT (≈78%), while CHIRPS detected only about half of rainfall events (≈54%) and tended to overestimate no-rain days. MSWEP’s error composition is dominated by low random error (~52%), though it slightly overestimates rainfall and rainy days. TAMSAT provides finer-resolution data that capture localized variability and dry conditions well, with the lowest false alarm rate and moderate random error (~59%). CHIRPS exhibits weaker daily performance, dominated by high random error (~66%) and missed bias, though it improves at monthly scales and better captures heavy and violent rainfall. Seasonally, SRPs reproduce MAM rainfall reasonably well across both sub-basins, but their performance deteriorates markedly in JJAS, particularly in the south. These findings highlight the importance of sub-basin scale analysis and demonstrate that random versus systematic error composition is critical for understanding product reliability. The results provide practical guidance for selecting and calibrating SRPs in mountainous regions, supporting improved water resource management, climate impact assessment, and hydrological modeling in data-scarce environments.

Remote SensingVol. 18(1)
Debre Berhan University (ET), Florida International University (US), Addis Ababa Science and Technology University (ET), Addis Ababa University (ET)
Addis Ababa University
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.