Optimal bank capital: a trade – off corporate finance perspective

In this paper I model the effect of costs and benefits of having equity on the bank weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Adopting a trade – off corporate finance perspective, costs are related to the loss in present value of debt tax shields and liquidity premium, while benefits are related to the reduction of bank failure probability. The distress effect is incorporated into the bank WACC through the “Cost of leverage” model of Fernandez (2002, 2007), adjusted for the liquidity premium level and for different bank debt policies. Incorporating the cost and benefits on overall cost of bank funding and together with the use of Merton (1974) model, I am able to obtain numerically the optimal level of bank capital, and capital requirements as a whole, for several firm specific and country characteristics (asset volatility, risk-free rate, debt maturity, tax rate, liquidity premium level). A trade off – based framework consistent with traditional corporate finance, presenting results in line with previous literature on bank capital requirements, supports both stability and individual bank value maximization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Banking Regulation
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-025-00301-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal bank capital: a trade – off corporate finance perspective

Federico Beltrame
1 citations
Journal of Banking Regulation
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
2.21
article

Optimal bank capital: a trade – off corporate finance perspective

Federico Beltrame
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper I model the effect of costs and benefits of having equity on the bank weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Adopting a trade – off corporate finance perspective, costs are related to the loss in present value of debt tax shields and liquidity premium, while benefits are related to the reduction of bank failure probability. The distress effect is incorporated into the bank WACC through the “Cost of leverage” model of Fernandez (2002, 2007), adjusted for the liquidity premium level and for different bank debt policies. Incorporating the cost and benefits on overall cost of bank funding and together with the use of Merton (1974) model, I am able to obtain numerically the optimal level of bank capital, and capital requirements as a whole, for several firm specific and country characteristics (asset volatility, risk-free rate, debt maturity, tax rate, liquidity premium level). A trade off – based framework consistent with traditional corporate finance, presenting results in line with previous literature on bank capital requirements, supports both stability and individual bank value maximization.

Journal of Banking RegulationVol. 27(1)
University of Udine (IT)
Università degli Studi di Udine
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.