Assessing service quality in higher education: a four-decade literature review (1984–2024)

Purpose This comprehensive systematic review aims to examine service quality assessment frameworks in higher education over four decades, from 1984 to 2024. It aims to identify key models, analyse applications and provide actionable insights. Design/methodology/approach The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) framework was used to conduct a systematic literature review, with searches across Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. From an initial pool of 820 documents, 275 studies were selected through a multi-stage screening process for thematic relevance and methodological robustness. Findings SERVQUAL, SERVPERF, HEdPERF and EduQUAL emerge as predominant assessment models. Persistent gaps are observed between students’ perceptions and expectations, highlighting the need to adapt frameworks to varied institutional contexts. Research limitations/implications Limitations include an English-language restriction, a geographic bias towards developed countries and an exclusive focus on student perspectives, neglecting other stakeholders. Future research should develop standardised benchmarks and enhance empirical validation. Practical implications Higher education institutions should integrate technology for real-time monitoring and develop context-specific frameworks. Enhanced stakeholder engagement and continuous improvement are essential for effective service quality management. Social implications Enhanced service quality frameworks promote educational equity by ensuring consistent standards across diverse contexts. Improved satisfaction contributes to better educational outcomes and social mobility. Originality/value This research provides the most comprehensive four-decade (1984–2024) systematic review, building upon prior, shorter-span systematic literature reviews (Teeroovengadum et al., 2016; Ali et al., 2016), by synthesising 275 studies across 66 countries. It offers unique insights into framework evolution, a novel 2024 literature cut-off and technology integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality Assurance in Education
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-08-2025-0229
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing service quality in higher education: a four-decade literature review (1984–2024)

Pavandeep Kataria, Chetna Sharma Rajput
1 citations
Quality Assurance in Education
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
2.76
article

Assessing service quality in higher education: a four-decade literature review (1984–2024)

Pavandeep Kataria, Chetna Sharma Rajput
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This comprehensive systematic review aims to examine service quality assessment frameworks in higher education over four decades, from 1984 to 2024. It aims to identify key models, analyse applications and provide actionable insights. Design/methodology/approach The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) framework was used to conduct a systematic literature review, with searches across Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. From an initial pool of 820 documents, 275 studies were selected through a multi-stage screening process for thematic relevance and methodological robustness. Findings SERVQUAL, SERVPERF, HEdPERF and EduQUAL emerge as predominant assessment models. Persistent gaps are observed between students’ perceptions and expectations, highlighting the need to adapt frameworks to varied institutional contexts. Research limitations/implications Limitations include an English-language restriction, a geographic bias towards developed countries and an exclusive focus on student perspectives, neglecting other stakeholders. Future research should develop standardised benchmarks and enhance empirical validation. Practical implications Higher education institutions should integrate technology for real-time monitoring and develop context-specific frameworks. Enhanced stakeholder engagement and continuous improvement are essential for effective service quality management. Social implications Enhanced service quality frameworks promote educational equity by ensuring consistent standards across diverse contexts. Improved satisfaction contributes to better educational outcomes and social mobility. Originality/value This research provides the most comprehensive four-decade (1984–2024) systematic review, building upon prior, shorter-span systematic literature reviews (Teeroovengadum et al., 2016; Ali et al., 2016), by synthesising 275 studies across 66 countries. It offers unique insights into framework evolution, a novel 2024 literature cut-off and technology integration.

Quality Assurance in Education
National Institute of Technology Raipur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.