Navigating uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for novel entities: The case of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and its precursors

Regulatory decision-making for novel entities such as trifluoroacetic acid, respectively trifluoroacetate (TFA), involves multiple forms of uncertainty. This paper applies a typology that structures uncertainty along two dimensions: types of uncertainty (epistemological, ontological, and ambiguity) and objects of uncertainty (substantive, strategic, and institutional). We argue that three key substantive features of TFA, its large number of precursors, its extreme environmental persistence, and its global mobility, do not only shape substantive uncertainties about its properties, effects, and mitigation, but also amplify strategic and institutional uncertainties. Specifically, the wide and fragmented network of actors involved in TFA’s regulation across sectors (e.g., water, pesticides) creates diffuse responsibilities and complicates coordination. TFA’s persistence intensifies ontological uncertainties, as continuous and potentially irreversible exposure renders some long-term impacts effectively unknowable within relevant policy timeframes. Its mobility challenges regulatory systems that are spatially and institutionally bound. Importantly, we show how regulatory outcomes are shaped not only by substantive or institutional challenges but also by competing actor framings and power asymmetries, as actors strategically influence how regulatory uncertainties are defined and addressed. These findings are not just relevant for TFA regulation, but also for the broader group of novel entities where regulatory decision-making depends on measures such as emission reduction, improved input control, increased regulatory transparency, and sensitivity to power asymmetries. We propose that the applied typology can serve as a boundary object to foster interdisciplinary dialogue in environmental governance, bridging distinct philosophical and disciplinary perspectives while remaining sufficiently open to accommodate different conceptual and disciplinary framings of uncertainty. The applied typology shows how different types and objects of uncertainty interact in decision-making around novel entities. • Applies a typology to structure uncertainty around trifluoroacetic acid. • Shows how precursors, persistence, and mobility amplify uncertainties. • Highlights the role of power and framing in regulatory decision-making. • Links trifluoroacetic acid to broader regulatory challenges for novel entities. • Typology serves as boundary object for interdisciplinary knowledge production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104299
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for novel entities: The case of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and its precursors

Michael Andreas Müller, Sylvia Kruse, Jens Lange, Jakob Kramer et al.
Environmental Science & Policy
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
article

Navigating uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for novel entities: The case of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and its precursors

Michael Andreas Müller, Sylvia Kruse, Jens Lange, Jakob Kramer, Jule Lichtner
article en

Abstract

Regulatory decision-making for novel entities such as trifluoroacetic acid, respectively trifluoroacetate (TFA), involves multiple forms of uncertainty. This paper applies a typology that structures uncertainty along two dimensions: types of uncertainty (epistemological, ontological, and ambiguity) and objects of uncertainty (substantive, strategic, and institutional). We argue that three key substantive features of TFA, its large number of precursors, its extreme environmental persistence, and its global mobility, do not only shape substantive uncertainties about its properties, effects, and mitigation, but also amplify strategic and institutional uncertainties. Specifically, the wide and fragmented network of actors involved in TFA’s regulation across sectors (e.g., water, pesticides) creates diffuse responsibilities and complicates coordination. TFA’s persistence intensifies ontological uncertainties, as continuous and potentially irreversible exposure renders some long-term impacts effectively unknowable within relevant policy timeframes. Its mobility challenges regulatory systems that are spatially and institutionally bound. Importantly, we show how regulatory outcomes are shaped not only by substantive or institutional challenges but also by competing actor framings and power asymmetries, as actors strategically influence how regulatory uncertainties are defined and addressed. These findings are not just relevant for TFA regulation, but also for the broader group of novel entities where regulatory decision-making depends on measures such as emission reduction, improved input control, increased regulatory transparency, and sensitivity to power asymmetries. We propose that the applied typology can serve as a boundary object to foster interdisciplinary dialogue in environmental governance, bridging distinct philosophical and disciplinary perspectives while remaining sufficiently open to accommodate different conceptual and disciplinary framings of uncertainty. The applied typology shows how different types and objects of uncertainty interact in decision-making around novel entities. • Applies a typology to structure uncertainty around trifluoroacetic acid. • Shows how precursors, persistence, and mobility amplify uncertainties. • Highlights the role of power and framing in regulatory decision-making. • Links trifluoroacetic acid to broader regulatory challenges for novel entities. • Typology serves as boundary object for interdisciplinary knowledge production.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 175
University of Freiburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.