Real-world evaluation of inter-consensus agreement on the Murad tool for appraising the methodological quality of case reports and case series
The current study demonstrates overall high agreement among different systematic review teams that used the Murad tool for appraisal of the same case series and case reports. Leveraging duplicated studies across systematic reviews is a feasible way to retrospectively assess the reliability of the tool.
Authors
- Magdoleen H. Farah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9700-737X)
- Samer Saadi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9225-1197)
- Mohammad Hassan Murad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5502-5975)
- Tamim Rajjo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4880-5081)
- Bashar Hasan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9531-4990)
- Ayla Shamsi Basha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8163-571X)
- Zhen Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9368-6149)
- Moustafa Hegazi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8190-3915)
- Mohamed Abusalih (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3326-301X)
- Adel Kabbara Allababidi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3354-4562)
Institutions
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JBI Evidence Synthesis
- Published
- 2025-12-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-25-00225
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00