Associations of Obesity with Function and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Rural Advanced Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Nurse AMIE Randomized Controlled Trial

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Obesity is a common comorbidity but there remains limited understanding on how higher obesity rates in rural areas may impact physical function decline and other health domains among cancer patients. This study addresses this gap by examining the association between body mass index (BMI) and physical function among a cohort of rural advanced cancer patients. <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional analysis uses baseline data from the Nurse AMIE trial (NCT04673019). Individuals were categorized as 'normal weight' (BMI ≤ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), 'overweight' (BMI > 25 to 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and 'obese' (BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Objective physical function was measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and subjective physical function and health domains were measured using surveys (PROMIS; SF-36). <b>Results:</b> Of 348 patients included, 88 (25.3%) were classified as 'normal weight', 107 (30.7%) as 'overweight', and 153 (44.0%) as 'obese'. Average age was 64.8 years (SD = 12.2), 46% (n = 160) were female, 95% were white (n = 331), and 52% (n = 182) were Stage 4. Total SPPB scores revealed poorer functioning with higher BMI (M ± SD: BMI ≤ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 9.1 ± 2.3; BMI > 25-30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 8.3 ± 3.1; BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 8.1 ± 2.8; <i>p</i> = 0.04). Similarly, scores from the SF-36 revealed subjective physical function was lower with higher BMI (BMI ≤ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 57.9 ± 29.1; BMI > 25-30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 53.7 ± 28.0; BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 47.6 ± 27.6; <i>p</i> = 0.004). Participants reported lower levels of energy and greater fatigue with higher BMI (BMI ≤ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 49.8 ± 26.1; BMI > 25-30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 45.1 ± 24.6; BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 40.7 ± 22.6; <i>p</i> = 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> Higher BMI is associated with poorer physical function and increased fatigue among rural advanced cancer patients, highlighting the need for supportive care related to physical function in this at-risk group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010006
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations of Obesity with Function and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Rural Advanced Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Nurse AMIE Randomized Controlled Trial

Nicole L. Stout, Samantha J. Werts, Jennifer L. Moss, Clair Smith et al.
Cancers
Cancer Risks and Factors
article

Associations of Obesity with Function and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Rural Advanced Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Nurse AMIE Randomized Controlled Trial

Nicole L. Stout, Samantha J. Werts, Jennifer L. Moss, Clair Smith, Kathryn H. Schmitz, Charity G. Patterson, Shawna E. Doerksen, William A. Calo, S.H. Baker
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Obesity is a common comorbidity but there remains limited understanding on how higher obesity rates in rural areas may impact physical function decline and other health domains among cancer patients. This study addresses this gap by examining the association between body mass index (BMI) and physical function among a cohort of rural advanced cancer patients. <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional analysis uses baseline data from the Nurse AMIE trial (NCT04673019). Individuals were categorized as 'normal weight' (BMI ≤ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), 'overweight' (BMI > 25 to 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and 'obese' (BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Objective physical function was measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and subjective physical function and health domains were measured using surveys (PROMIS; SF-36). <b>Results:</b> Of 348 patients included, 88 (25.3%) were classified as 'normal weight', 107 (30.7%) as 'overweight', and 153 (44.0%) as 'obese'. Average age was 64.8 years (SD = 12.2), 46% (n = 160) were female, 95% were white (n = 331), and 52% (n = 182) were Stage 4. Total SPPB scores revealed poorer functioning with higher BMI (M ± SD: BMI ≤ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 9.1 ± 2.3; BMI > 25-30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 8.3 ± 3.1; BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 8.1 ± 2.8; <i>p</i> = 0.04). Similarly, scores from the SF-36 revealed subjective physical function was lower with higher BMI (BMI ≤ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 57.9 ± 29.1; BMI > 25-30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 53.7 ± 28.0; BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 47.6 ± 27.6; <i>p</i> = 0.004). Participants reported lower levels of energy and greater fatigue with higher BMI (BMI ≤ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 49.8 ± 26.1; BMI > 25-30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 45.1 ± 24.6; BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 40.7 ± 22.6; <i>p</i> = 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> Higher BMI is associated with poorer physical function and increased fatigue among rural advanced cancer patients, highlighting the need for supportive care related to physical function in this at-risk group.

CancersVol. 18(1)
American Cancer Society (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US), Department of Public Health (MM), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Cancer Risks and Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.