Assessing the Reliability of Automatic Milking Systems Data to Support Genetic Improvement in Dairy Cattle

This study investigates the reliability and potential genetic utility of data recorded by automatic milking systems by comparing them with official milk recording data. Analyses focused on phenotypic distributions, correlations, systematic differences, and heritability estimates for milk production and quality traits including milk yield, fat and protein percentage, somatic cell count, and electrical conductivity. Automatic milking system data and official milk recording data shared similar distributions. Correlations between the two systems were high for milk yield (r = 0.93), but moderate for fat (r = 0.52) and protein percentage (r = 0.48), and somatic cell count (r = 0.62), suggesting that while the former provides consistent data for quantity traits, quality-related ones may be less reliable. Systematic deviations between automatic milking systems and official milk recordings emerged across different lactation stages. Heritability estimates based on automatic milking system data were generally higher than the official control for production traits, supporting their use in genetic evaluations. Electrical conductivity displayed a similar heritability to somatic cell count, but its measure is insufficiently detailed and its use as an indirect indicator of udder health is not recommended. Automatic milking system data demonstrates potential for integration into genetic selection programs, although further refinement of sensor accuracy is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16010001
Primary Topic
Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Reliability of Automatic Milking Systems Data to Support Genetic Improvement in Dairy Cattle

Riccardo Moretti, Enrico Ponzo, S. Chessa, Paola Sacchi et al.
Animals
Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
article

Assessing the Reliability of Automatic Milking Systems Data to Support Genetic Improvement in Dairy Cattle

Riccardo Moretti, Enrico Ponzo, S. Chessa, Paola Sacchi, Fernando Masía, Elisa Vrieze
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the reliability and potential genetic utility of data recorded by automatic milking systems by comparing them with official milk recording data. Analyses focused on phenotypic distributions, correlations, systematic differences, and heritability estimates for milk production and quality traits including milk yield, fat and protein percentage, somatic cell count, and electrical conductivity. Automatic milking system data and official milk recording data shared similar distributions. Correlations between the two systems were high for milk yield (r = 0.93), but moderate for fat (r = 0.52) and protein percentage (r = 0.48), and somatic cell count (r = 0.62), suggesting that while the former provides consistent data for quantity traits, quality-related ones may be less reliable. Systematic deviations between automatic milking systems and official milk recordings emerged across different lactation stages. Heritability estimates based on automatic milking system data were generally higher than the official control for production traits, supporting their use in genetic evaluations. Electrical conductivity displayed a similar heritability to somatic cell count, but its measure is insufficiently detailed and its use as an indirect indicator of udder health is not recommended. Automatic milking system data demonstrates potential for integration into genetic selection programs, although further refinement of sensor accuracy is recommended.

AnimalsVol. 16(1)
International New Town Institute (NL), University of Turin (IT)
Fondazione CRT
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.