Facilitating Novice Visual Search with tES over rIFG: Baseline-Dependent Gains in Target Identification

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) shows potential for enhancing attention and learning, yet its effects in applied contexts remain underexplored. This study investigated whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) either alone or in combination with high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS) over the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) could enhance performance in a visual search task requiring target identification and change detection, compared with a low-current control condition. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty-four participants were randomly assigned to receive tDCS alone (2.0 mA), tDCS with hf-tRNS (1.8 mA DC offset combined with 100-500 Hz noise at ±0.18 mA), or low-current control stimulation during training. The task involved identifying vehicles and detecting changes between image presentations. Performance accuracy and EEG oscillatory power were assessed at baseline and post-stimulation. <b>Results:</b> ANCOVA revealed significant effects of stimulation on target identification accuracy (F(2,60) = 3.27, <i>p</i> = 0.045, η<i>p</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.098), with tDCS showing greater improvement than the low-current control condition (<i>p</i> = 0.017). No significant effects were found for change detection for any stimulation condition, or for either the target or change detection for hf-tRNS. Baseline performance moderated stimulation effects: low performers receiving tDCS showed the greatest improvements (F(2,26) = 3.80, <i>p</i> = 0.036, η<i>p</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.226), surpassing even high-baseline performers post-training. EEG analyses revealed that participants who showed greater decreases in frontal theta power demonstrated larger improvements in accuracy with tDCS alone (r = -0.634, <i>p</i> = 0.005) but not with hf-tRNS or the control. <b>Conclusions:</b> tDCS over rIFG selectively enhanced target identification accuracy in a complex visual search, particularly benefiting individuals with lower-baseline performance. These findings suggest tDCS may facilitate training in lower-performing novice populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010001
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facilitating Novice Visual Search with tES over rIFG: Baseline-Dependent Gains in Target Identification

Aaron T. Winder, Bradley Robert, Vincent P. Clark, Mason Briggs et al.
Brain Sciences
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Facilitating Novice Visual Search with tES over rIFG: Baseline-Dependent Gains in Target Identification

Aaron T. Winder, Bradley Robert, Vincent P. Clark, Mason Briggs, Gabriella I. Atencio
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) shows potential for enhancing attention and learning, yet its effects in applied contexts remain underexplored. This study investigated whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) either alone or in combination with high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS) over the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) could enhance performance in a visual search task requiring target identification and change detection, compared with a low-current control condition. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty-four participants were randomly assigned to receive tDCS alone (2.0 mA), tDCS with hf-tRNS (1.8 mA DC offset combined with 100-500 Hz noise at ±0.18 mA), or low-current control stimulation during training. The task involved identifying vehicles and detecting changes between image presentations. Performance accuracy and EEG oscillatory power were assessed at baseline and post-stimulation. <b>Results:</b> ANCOVA revealed significant effects of stimulation on target identification accuracy (F(2,60) = 3.27, <i>p</i> = 0.045, η<i>p</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.098), with tDCS showing greater improvement than the low-current control condition (<i>p</i> = 0.017). No significant effects were found for change detection for any stimulation condition, or for either the target or change detection for hf-tRNS. Baseline performance moderated stimulation effects: low performers receiving tDCS showed the greatest improvements (F(2,26) = 3.80, <i>p</i> = 0.036, η<i>p</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.226), surpassing even high-baseline performers post-training. EEG analyses revealed that participants who showed greater decreases in frontal theta power demonstrated larger improvements in accuracy with tDCS alone (r = -0.634, <i>p</i> = 0.005) but not with hf-tRNS or the control. <b>Conclusions:</b> tDCS over rIFG selectively enhanced target identification accuracy in a complex visual search, particularly benefiting individuals with lower-baseline performance. These findings suggest tDCS may facilitate training in lower-performing novice populations.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(1)
University of New Mexico (US), Charles River Analytics (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.