Facing Inequalities in a Communist Country: The Case of Peasant Poverty in the Socialist Republic of Slovenia

This article examines how socialist Slovenia produced, obscured, recognized, and partially mitigated peasant poverty. While the official ideology equated full employment, nationalization, and subsidized services with the eradication of poverty, policy and practice relied on euphemisms (“materially deprived”) and framed inequality as transitional. Tracing four political periods (1945–1990), it shows how debates within the Communist Party, measurement via living-cost baskets, exposed persistent disparities, especially between urban and rural populations. A bimodal agricultural strategy privileges state agricultural enterprises and marginalizes small private farms drives deagrarization and rural vulnerability. Households responded through part-time farming (pluriactivity), while gradual, uneven integration into health, pension, and family benefits only culminated in the 1980s. Regional policies have softened but have not erased structural gaps. This article argues that socialist egalitarianism simultaneously compressed and reproduced inequalities in its own way, leaving peasants particularly exposed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Historiae Oeconomicae
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/sho.2025.43.2.008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facing Inequalities in a Communist Country: The Case of Peasant Poverty in the Socialist Republic of Slovenia

Žarko Lazarević
1 citations
Studia Historiae Oeconomicae
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
4.20
article

Facing Inequalities in a Communist Country: The Case of Peasant Poverty in the Socialist Republic of Slovenia

Žarko Lazarević
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines how socialist Slovenia produced, obscured, recognized, and partially mitigated peasant poverty. While the official ideology equated full employment, nationalization, and subsidized services with the eradication of poverty, policy and practice relied on euphemisms (“materially deprived”) and framed inequality as transitional. Tracing four political periods (1945–1990), it shows how debates within the Communist Party, measurement via living-cost baskets, exposed persistent disparities, especially between urban and rural populations. A bimodal agricultural strategy privileges state agricultural enterprises and marginalizes small private farms drives deagrarization and rural vulnerability. Households responded through part-time farming (pluriactivity), while gradual, uneven integration into health, pension, and family benefits only culminated in the 1980s. Regional policies have softened but have not erased structural gaps. This article argues that socialist egalitarianism simultaneously compressed and reproduced inequalities in its own way, leaving peasants particularly exposed.

Studia Historiae OeconomicaeVol. 43(2)
Institute of Contemporary History (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.