Patient-Reported Financial Burden in Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Financial toxicity (FT) refers to the financial burden directly or indirectly caused by a patient's medical care. Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are particularly vulnerable to FT due to lower rates of return to work and higher out-of-pocket payments (OOPP). In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the amount and types of OOPP, as well as the prevalence of FT, in HNC patients who had completed curative radiotherapy. <b>Methods</b>: We included HNC patients who underwent curative-intent radiotherapy at four private clinics in Romania, within 12 months of completing treatment. Participants completed a 25-item questionnaire capturing sociodemographic information, insurance status, income, and OOPP. To assess subjective FT, we used the validated nine-item Financial Index of Toxicity (FIT), which measures three FT domains: financial stress, financial strain, and lost productivity. Each domain and the total score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater financial toxicity. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics. Pearson's chi-square, <i>t</i>-tests, and one-way ANOVA were used to assess statistical associations, with a significance threshold of <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results</b>: Among 113 patients (mean age: 59), the majority were male (74.3%) and married (74.3%), with 40% having completed university or higher education. The most frequent tumor sites were the oropharynx (29 cases), larynx (22), and oral cavity (21). Concurrent chemoradiation was the most common treatment modality (47%). The mean total FT score was 18.8. Overall, 39.8% of patients experienced financial toxicity, and 29.2% scored above the mean in financial stress. Moderate financial strain (score > 21) was reported by 39.8% of participants, and approximately one-third reported loss of productivity. Transportation and nutritional supplements were the most common OOPP categories. Notably, 42% of patients spent at least 400 euros-equivalent to Romania's monthly minimum income-on transportation during radiotherapy. FT was significantly associated with employment and marital status, but not with tumor site or treatment type. <b>Conclusions</b>: Among Romanian HNC patients treated with curative radiotherapy, we found substantial OOPP, particularly for transportation and nutritional supplements. While overall FT levels were moderate, divorced patients and those retired due to other chronic conditions were the most vulnerable to financial distress. Financial toxicity can directly affect treatment adherence, survival, and quality of life. By integrating financial counseling, social support, and broader coverage of treatment-related expenses, healthcare systems can mitigate FT for these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010003
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-Reported Financial Burden in Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy

Monica-Emilia Chirilă, G. Ciobanu, Daniela Sturzu, Ana Ciobanu et al.
Cancers
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Patient-Reported Financial Burden in Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy

Monica-Emilia Chirilă, G. Ciobanu, Daniela Sturzu, Ana Ciobanu, Gabriel Kacsó, Renata Zahu, R Costache, Otilia Ciobanu, Noemi Besenyodi, Madalina Vesel-Pop, Flavius Coșer
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Financial toxicity (FT) refers to the financial burden directly or indirectly caused by a patient's medical care. Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are particularly vulnerable to FT due to lower rates of return to work and higher out-of-pocket payments (OOPP). In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the amount and types of OOPP, as well as the prevalence of FT, in HNC patients who had completed curative radiotherapy. <b>Methods</b>: We included HNC patients who underwent curative-intent radiotherapy at four private clinics in Romania, within 12 months of completing treatment. Participants completed a 25-item questionnaire capturing sociodemographic information, insurance status, income, and OOPP. To assess subjective FT, we used the validated nine-item Financial Index of Toxicity (FIT), which measures three FT domains: financial stress, financial strain, and lost productivity. Each domain and the total score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater financial toxicity. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics. Pearson's chi-square, <i>t</i>-tests, and one-way ANOVA were used to assess statistical associations, with a significance threshold of <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results</b>: Among 113 patients (mean age: 59), the majority were male (74.3%) and married (74.3%), with 40% having completed university or higher education. The most frequent tumor sites were the oropharynx (29 cases), larynx (22), and oral cavity (21). Concurrent chemoradiation was the most common treatment modality (47%). The mean total FT score was 18.8. Overall, 39.8% of patients experienced financial toxicity, and 29.2% scored above the mean in financial stress. Moderate financial strain (score > 21) was reported by 39.8% of participants, and approximately one-third reported loss of productivity. Transportation and nutritional supplements were the most common OOPP categories. Notably, 42% of patients spent at least 400 euros-equivalent to Romania's monthly minimum income-on transportation during radiotherapy. FT was significantly associated with employment and marital status, but not with tumor site or treatment type. <b>Conclusions</b>: Among Romanian HNC patients treated with curative radiotherapy, we found substantial OOPP, particularly for transportation and nutritional supplements. While overall FT levels were moderate, divorced patients and those retired due to other chronic conditions were the most vulnerable to financial distress. Financial toxicity can directly affect treatment adherence, survival, and quality of life. By integrating financial counseling, social support, and broader coverage of treatment-related expenses, healthcare systems can mitigate FT for these patients.

CancersVol. 18(1)
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), West University of Timişoara (RO), Societatea Ornitologică Română (RO), Camera de Comerț Industrie și Agricultură Timișoara (RO), 1 Decembrie 1918 University (RO), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.