Training for vigilance on the move using knowledge of results: The effects of feedback type on performance and subjective response

The present experiment investigated the effects of the type of knowledge of results (KR) on performance, workload, and stress in a dynamic, first-person perspective vigilance task. There were five KR conditions: Complete KR, which included feedback regarding hits, misses, and false alarms; three conditions in which participants received only one of these types; and finally a No KR control. Half of the participants in each of these conditions also received summary feedback at the end of their training phase. Those receiving Complete KR were the only group for which detection performance exceeded that of the control group. Summary KR reduced false alarm frequency during the subsequent (transfer) vigil but also resulted in higher levels of perceived workload and emotion-focused coping. These findings suggest that while KR can benefit vigilance training, such benefits are moderated by KR type and can affect concomitant subjective experience during task performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ergonomics
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2588167
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training for vigilance on the move using knowledge of results: The effects of feedback type on performance and subjective response

Peter A. Hancock, Tarah N. Schmidt-Daly, James L. Szalma, Grace Teo
Ergonomics
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Training for vigilance on the move using knowledge of results: The effects of feedback type on performance and subjective response

Peter A. Hancock, Tarah N. Schmidt-Daly, James L. Szalma, Grace Teo
article en

Abstract

The present experiment investigated the effects of the type of knowledge of results (KR) on performance, workload, and stress in a dynamic, first-person perspective vigilance task. There were five KR conditions: Complete KR, which included feedback regarding hits, misses, and false alarms; three conditions in which participants received only one of these types; and finally a No KR control. Half of the participants in each of these conditions also received summary feedback at the end of their training phase. Those receiving Complete KR were the only group for which detection performance exceeded that of the control group. Summary KR reduced false alarm frequency during the subsequent (transfer) vigil but also resulted in higher levels of perceived workload and emotion-focused coping. These findings suggest that while KR can benefit vigilance training, such benefits are moderated by KR type and can affect concomitant subjective experience during task performance.

Ergonomics
University of Central Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Training for vigilance on the move using knowledge of results: The effects of feedback type on performance and subjective response — Peter A. Hancock, Tarah N. Schmidt-Daly, et al. · Ergonomics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS