Frameworks encompassing intersectional perspective of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Scoping review

Significant gaps remain in addressing intersectional biases in AI frameworks, particularly for underrepresented groups such as individuals with disabilities and non-citizens. Despite many frameworks demonstrating efforts toward inclusivity, attention to intersectionality remains uneven and largely inconsistent. Mapping biases to lifecycle phases highlights actionable strategies to improve equity and inclusivity in AI-driven healthcare. These findings provide valuable guidance for researchers, policymakers, and developers to create equitable and responsible AI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Health in Practice
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100713
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frameworks encompassing intersectional perspective of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Scoping review

Carlos Adrian Vargas Campos, Clara Bermúdez‐Tamayo, Saulo Roberto dos Santos
Public Health in Practice
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Frameworks encompassing intersectional perspective of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Scoping review

Carlos Adrian Vargas Campos, Clara Bermúdez‐Tamayo, Saulo Roberto dos Santos
article en

Abstract

Significant gaps remain in addressing intersectional biases in AI frameworks, particularly for underrepresented groups such as individuals with disabilities and non-citizens. Despite many frameworks demonstrating efforts toward inclusivity, attention to intersectionality remains uneven and largely inconsistent. Mapping biases to lifecycle phases highlights actionable strategies to improve equity and inclusivity in AI-driven healthcare. These findings provide valuable guidance for researchers, policymakers, and developers to create equitable and responsible AI systems.

Public Health in PracticeVol. 11
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad de Granada (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES), Andalusian School of Public Health (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Frameworks encompassing intersectional perspective of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Scoping review — Carlos Adrian Vargas Campos, Clara Bermúdez‐Tamayo, et al. · Public Health in Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS