A Compact Low-loss Additive-manufactured Redirecting Heat Exchanger (CLARE): The evolution of aerodynamic efficiency

• Evoluted heat exchanger shows increased highspeed performance under oblique inflow • Staggering and contouring the leading edge have similar benefits • Homogenizing the inflow and reducing the leading edge separation is essential This paper presents the evolution of a matrix starting from a straight inlet-duct and targeting a staggered configuration with adapted edges and oblique inflow in three steps. Major loss mechanisms of each step are quantified using a comprehensive 3D CFD model. By the end, the heat exchanger enables an inlet velocity being 2.7 higher while increasing the pressure loss coefficient in the range between 5.3 % and 12.2 % in comparison to the same matrix under straight inflow. Further optimization potential is identified by reducing the leading edge flow separation and homogenizing the inflow into the matrix.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108618
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Compact Low-loss Additive-manufactured Redirecting Heat Exchanger (CLARE): The evolution of aerodynamic efficiency

M. Bitter, Dragan Kožulović, Jürgen Inkoferer
Results in Engineering
Heat Transfer and Optimization
article

A Compact Low-loss Additive-manufactured Redirecting Heat Exchanger (CLARE): The evolution of aerodynamic efficiency

M. Bitter, Dragan Kožulović, Jürgen Inkoferer
article en

Abstract

• Evoluted heat exchanger shows increased highspeed performance under oblique inflow • Staggering and contouring the leading edge have similar benefits • Homogenizing the inflow and reducing the leading edge separation is essential This paper presents the evolution of a matrix starting from a straight inlet-duct and targeting a staggered configuration with adapted edges and oblique inflow in three steps. Major loss mechanisms of each step are quantified using a comprehensive 3D CFD model. By the end, the heat exchanger enables an inlet velocity being 2.7 higher while increasing the pressure loss coefficient in the range between 5.3 % and 12.2 % in comparison to the same matrix under straight inflow. Further optimization potential is identified by reducing the leading edge flow separation and homogenizing the inflow into the matrix.

Results in EngineeringVol. 29
Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Heat Transfer and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.