Evaluating the fitness for reuse of earth blocks reclaimed from load-bearing masonry: The case for compressive strength

• The studied earth blocks are suitable for reuse regarding compressive strength. • Sustained loading affects the compressive strength of reclaimed earth blocks. • Non-stabilised earth blocks show increased strength after sustained loading. • Stabilised earth blocks show reduced or unchanged strength after sustained loading. • Block’s compressive strength changes vary with mortar type and block orientation. Retrieving masonry units for reuse is a promising circular strategy to reduce environmental impacts, yet their technical suitability for reuse remains insufficiently understood. Earth blocks are relatively easy to reclaim, and this study is the first to assess whether they retain adequate performance after reclamation from load-bearing structures. Fitness for reuse was evaluated by comparing the compressive strength of blocks before and after sustained loading. The effect of sustained loading was isolated in the laboratory through a controlled testing sequence that comprised sustained loading of masonry columns, deconstruction and cleaning of blocks, and testing of both new and reclaimed blocks. Columns were built using commercially available nonstabilised moulded earth blocks (MEBs) and cement-stabilised compressed earth blocks (CEBs), combined with thick-bed earth mortar (EM) and thin-layer earthadhesive mortar (EAM). Blocks were reclaimed using a hammer drill and cleaned with a joint knife. Large sample sizes of both new and reclaimed blocks were tested, and inferential statistics, including independent t-tests and General Linear Models (GLMs), were applied to detect changes in compressive strength. Results show that sustained loading affects compressive strength differently across block-mortar combinations. MEBs consistently exhibited increases of 6% and 11%, depending on mortar type, whereas CEBs showed either a reduction of 6% or no change, depending on block orientation. The findings demonstrate the fitness for reuse in both block types based on compressive strength but highlight the need to assess whether CEB strength reductions stabilise or worsen under prolonged loading and to investigate their underlying mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108806
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the fitness for reuse of earth blocks reclaimed from load-bearing masonry: The case for compressive strength

E Pelicaen, Erik Nuyts, Rik Steensels, Elke Knapen et al.
1 citations
Results in Engineering
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
1.01
article

Evaluating the fitness for reuse of earth blocks reclaimed from load-bearing masonry: The case for compressive strength

E Pelicaen, Erik Nuyts, Rik Steensels, Elke Knapen, Bram Vandoren, Eline Vereecken, Rafael Novais Passarelli, Veerle Vandersmissen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• The studied earth blocks are suitable for reuse regarding compressive strength. • Sustained loading affects the compressive strength of reclaimed earth blocks. • Non-stabilised earth blocks show increased strength after sustained loading. • Stabilised earth blocks show reduced or unchanged strength after sustained loading. • Block’s compressive strength changes vary with mortar type and block orientation. Retrieving masonry units for reuse is a promising circular strategy to reduce environmental impacts, yet their technical suitability for reuse remains insufficiently understood. Earth blocks are relatively easy to reclaim, and this study is the first to assess whether they retain adequate performance after reclamation from load-bearing structures. Fitness for reuse was evaluated by comparing the compressive strength of blocks before and after sustained loading. The effect of sustained loading was isolated in the laboratory through a controlled testing sequence that comprised sustained loading of masonry columns, deconstruction and cleaning of blocks, and testing of both new and reclaimed blocks. Columns were built using commercially available nonstabilised moulded earth blocks (MEBs) and cement-stabilised compressed earth blocks (CEBs), combined with thick-bed earth mortar (EM) and thin-layer earthadhesive mortar (EAM). Blocks were reclaimed using a hammer drill and cleaned with a joint knife. Large sample sizes of both new and reclaimed blocks were tested, and inferential statistics, including independent t-tests and General Linear Models (GLMs), were applied to detect changes in compressive strength. Results show that sustained loading affects compressive strength differently across block-mortar combinations. MEBs consistently exhibited increases of 6% and 11%, depending on mortar type, whereas CEBs showed either a reduction of 6% or no change, depending on block orientation. The findings demonstrate the fitness for reuse in both block types based on compressive strength but highlight the need to assess whether CEB strength reductions stabilise or worsen under prolonged loading and to investigate their underlying mechanisms.

Results in EngineeringVol. 29
Hasselt University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hygrothermal properties of building materials
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.