Repurposing mines for renewable energy: Socio-environmental implications for local communities in Australia and Germany

The demand for low-carbon energy to tackle the climate crisis requires large swathes of land to develop renewable energy infrastructure, such as wind, solar, geothermal, hydrogen, or pumped hydro. Claiming to avoid encroaching on already occupied landscapes where different forms of tenure exist, the energy industry is increasingly targeting closed and abandoned mine areas. This transformation not only promises to mitigate or address the ecological impact of mining but is also promoted as a means of local socio-economic development through employment creation, redressing energy poverty, and community benefit sharing within the renewable energy sector. However, these developments can have grave social and environmental impacts and thus may exacerbate transitional and intersectional inequalities and injustices. Hence, careful planning and stakeholder engagement are vital to ensuring that repurposing projects reflect the needs and values of impacted communities and the historical and political contexts of mining areas. Shedding light on the situation in Australia and Germany, two countries at the forefront of these new energy initiatives, this article presents perspectives from engineering and anthropology to discuss some of the social and environmental risks involved in the repurposing of mines. From these interdisciplinary conversations, we develop policy recommendations for a just energy transition and sketch some directions for future research. • Urgent shift to renewables demands land; abandoned mines are targeted. • Clean energy: Intersectional inequalities, environmental injustices in Germany & Australia. • Cross-disciplinary discussion: environmental, social, and technology factors. • Policy and research must consider mining sites' social/environmental histories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104508
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repurposing mines for renewable energy: Socio-environmental implications for local communities in Australia and Germany

Karl‐Werner Schramm, Christoph Helbig, Florian Heberle, Timothy A. Weber et al.
Energy Research & Social Science
Mining and Resource Management
article

Repurposing mines for renewable energy: Socio-environmental implications for local communities in Australia and Germany

Karl‐Werner Schramm, Christoph Helbig, Florian Heberle, Timothy A. Weber, Tim T. Werner, Joshua Matanzima, Hannah Uhrmann, Asta Vonderau
article en

Abstract

The demand for low-carbon energy to tackle the climate crisis requires large swathes of land to develop renewable energy infrastructure, such as wind, solar, geothermal, hydrogen, or pumped hydro. Claiming to avoid encroaching on already occupied landscapes where different forms of tenure exist, the energy industry is increasingly targeting closed and abandoned mine areas. This transformation not only promises to mitigate or address the ecological impact of mining but is also promoted as a means of local socio-economic development through employment creation, redressing energy poverty, and community benefit sharing within the renewable energy sector. However, these developments can have grave social and environmental impacts and thus may exacerbate transitional and intersectional inequalities and injustices. Hence, careful planning and stakeholder engagement are vital to ensuring that repurposing projects reflect the needs and values of impacted communities and the historical and political contexts of mining areas. Shedding light on the situation in Australia and Germany, two countries at the forefront of these new energy initiatives, this article presents perspectives from engineering and anthropology to discuss some of the social and environmental risks involved in the repurposing of mines. From these interdisciplinary conversations, we develop policy recommendations for a just energy transition and sketch some directions for future research. • Urgent shift to renewables demands land; abandoned mines are targeted. • Clean energy: Intersectional inequalities, environmental injustices in Germany & Australia. • Cross-disciplinary discussion: environmental, social, and technology factors. • Policy and research must consider mining sites' social/environmental histories.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 131
Australian National University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Bayreuth (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.