Life cycle assessment of a conventional thermal energy storage system versus an alternative steel slag-based system for concentrating solar power plants

Thermal Energy Storage (TES) plays a crucial role in advancing decarbonisation. Its integration into Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants can significantly enhance efficiency and support renewable power generation. The primary commercial TES material, Solar Salt (SS), presents technical challenges and has the highest environmental impact in TES systems. An innovative alternative is Electric Arc Furnace Steel Slag (EAFSS), a steel industry by-product that can be repurposed as TES material. However, the environmental sustainability of EAFSS for TES applications has not been comprehensively studied. This research quantified the environmental impact of a thermocline TES system using EAFSS as a filler material, compared with a conventional SS system. A Life Cycle Assessment, employing mass and economic allocation methods, examined EAFSS environmental burdens across two SS reduction scenarios. A sensitivity analysis of EAFSS costs showed savings exceeding 30 % compared to SS. At the CSP plant level, the ReCiPe method indicated impact reductions of 9–10 % using mass allocation and 22–26 % with economic allocation. Global warming emissions were higher with mass allocation (0.400–0.408 kg CO 2eq /kWh) than with the conventional TES system (0.358 kg CO 2eq /kWh), which may benefit steelmaking industries by attributing a larger share of their emissions to CSP systems. In contrast, economic allocation yielded lower emissions (0.330–0.325 kg CO 2eq /kWh), providing more credit to EAFSS for its valorisation. These findings underscore the potential of EAFSS to enhance CSP sustainability while valorising waste/by-products to generate greener electricity. • Recycling steel slag as TES material reduces environmental impacts on CSP plants • Sustainability and circularity of waste materials for CSP plants • Life cycle assessment (LCA) showed impact reduction in TES systems using steel slag • Valorising steel by-products in CSP plants can improve sustainability

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Storage
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.119843
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Phase Change Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment of a conventional thermal energy storage system versus an alternative steel slag-based system for concentrating solar power plants

Alejandro Calderón, Camila Barreneche, Adela Svobodova‐Sedlackova, Marc Majó et al.
1 citations
Journal of Energy Storage
Phase Change Materials Research
0.71
article

Life cycle assessment of a conventional thermal energy storage system versus an alternative steel slag-based system for concentrating solar power plants

Alejandro Calderón, Camila Barreneche, Adela Svobodova‐Sedlackova, Marc Majó, A. Inés Fernández, Carlos A. Vielma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Thermal Energy Storage (TES) plays a crucial role in advancing decarbonisation. Its integration into Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants can significantly enhance efficiency and support renewable power generation. The primary commercial TES material, Solar Salt (SS), presents technical challenges and has the highest environmental impact in TES systems. An innovative alternative is Electric Arc Furnace Steel Slag (EAFSS), a steel industry by-product that can be repurposed as TES material. However, the environmental sustainability of EAFSS for TES applications has not been comprehensively studied. This research quantified the environmental impact of a thermocline TES system using EAFSS as a filler material, compared with a conventional SS system. A Life Cycle Assessment, employing mass and economic allocation methods, examined EAFSS environmental burdens across two SS reduction scenarios. A sensitivity analysis of EAFSS costs showed savings exceeding 30 % compared to SS. At the CSP plant level, the ReCiPe method indicated impact reductions of 9–10 % using mass allocation and 22–26 % with economic allocation. Global warming emissions were higher with mass allocation (0.400–0.408 kg CO 2eq /kWh) than with the conventional TES system (0.358 kg CO 2eq /kWh), which may benefit steelmaking industries by attributing a larger share of their emissions to CSP systems. In contrast, economic allocation yielded lower emissions (0.330–0.325 kg CO 2eq /kWh), providing more credit to EAFSS for its valorisation. These findings underscore the potential of EAFSS to enhance CSP sustainability while valorising waste/by-products to generate greener electricity. • Recycling steel slag as TES material reduces environmental impacts on CSP plants • Sustainability and circularity of waste materials for CSP plants • Life cycle assessment (LCA) showed impact reduction in TES systems using steel slag • Valorising steel by-products in CSP plants can improve sustainability

Journal of Energy StorageVol. 145
Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Phase Change Materials Research
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.