Sex Differences in the Association Between Cannabis Use Motives and Cannabis-Related Problems

The current study examined sex differences in cannabis use motives and whether sex moderated the association between cannabis use motives and cannabis-related problems. Seven hundred and forty-one adults reporting past-month cannabis use completed online questionnaires on cannabis use motives (Marijuana Motives Measure) and cannabis-related problems (Marijuana Problem Scale). Independent samples <i>t</i>-tests and hierarchical multiple linear regressions were performed. Analyses indicated significant sex differences in cannabis use motives, with male participants reporting greater motives for the coping, conformity, social, and expansion subscales relative to female participants. There were significant interactions between sex and enhancement, expansion, and coping motives in relation to cannabis use problems, suggesting male participants had a stronger relationship between these motives and problems than female participants. Sex also moderated the association between enhancement motives and cannabis use problems even when all cannabis use motives were included in the same model. Male participants had a stronger association between enhancement motives and cannabis-related problems, above and beyond all other motives. These findings highlight the importance of cannabis use motives as critical targets for interventions designed for both male and female adults, and that enhancement motives may be especially relevant for male adults who use cannabis with high levels of self-reported problematic use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2603332
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in the Association Between Cannabis Use Motives and Cannabis-Related Problems

Megan Campbell, Anita Cservenka, Christopher M. Mullin, Lacey C. Donahue
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Sex Differences in the Association Between Cannabis Use Motives and Cannabis-Related Problems

Megan Campbell, Anita Cservenka, Christopher M. Mullin, Lacey C. Donahue
article en

Abstract

The current study examined sex differences in cannabis use motives and whether sex moderated the association between cannabis use motives and cannabis-related problems. Seven hundred and forty-one adults reporting past-month cannabis use completed online questionnaires on cannabis use motives (Marijuana Motives Measure) and cannabis-related problems (Marijuana Problem Scale). Independent samples <i>t</i>-tests and hierarchical multiple linear regressions were performed. Analyses indicated significant sex differences in cannabis use motives, with male participants reporting greater motives for the coping, conformity, social, and expansion subscales relative to female participants. There were significant interactions between sex and enhancement, expansion, and coping motives in relation to cannabis use problems, suggesting male participants had a stronger relationship between these motives and problems than female participants. Sex also moderated the association between enhancement motives and cannabis use problems even when all cannabis use motives were included in the same model. Male participants had a stronger association between enhancement motives and cannabis-related problems, above and beyond all other motives. These findings highlight the importance of cannabis use motives as critical targets for interventions designed for both male and female adults, and that enhancement motives may be especially relevant for male adults who use cannabis with high levels of self-reported problematic use.

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Oregon State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.