Thermal coupling between a small modular nuclear reactor and a high-temperature steam electrolysis process: energy performance mapping of key design options

• 16 layouts coupling a Small Modular Reactor to High-Temperature Electrolysis compared. • A 13% H 2 production gain obtained by the main layout vs the uncoupled thermal layout. • Results on the main configuration deviate by 3% from a freely available heat layout. • Results on the main configuration outperform the heat-pump solution by more than 4 %. • The solutions with two-ways thermal coupling more efficient than the one-way layout. This article presents the main results of a three-year R&D program on the coupling of a Small Modular Reactor (SMR) nuclear unit to a hydrogen production process using High-Temperature Steam Electrolysis (HTSE). Different coupling architectures are investigated and their energetic evaluation is performed in comparison with a reference configuration. The separate effects that are considered are comprehensive and include: thermal coupling (with or without, unidirectional or bidirectional − modulo internal heat recovery effort in the HTSE process itself), direct or indirect steam supply, location of the Rankine cycle extraction point, pressurization of the HTSE (with or without mechanical energy recovery through gas expansion) and oxygen content (impact of the swept gas). Remarkably, the simulation results obtained on the reference configuration show a gain of over 13% in hydrogen production compared with the solution involving no thermal coupling between the SMR and the HTSE process (when HTSE heat is provided through electrical heaters), with a deviation as low as 3 % from an idealized configuration with freely available heat. It even outperforms the heat-pump solution by more than 4 %. These key energetic results were supplemented by other technical criteria, such as those relating to safety and technological maturity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2025.104780
Primary Topic
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermal coupling between a small modular nuclear reactor and a high-temperature steam electrolysis process: energy performance mapping of key design options

Nicolas Tauveron, David Haubensack, Ph. Dumoulin, N. Alpy
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
article

Thermal coupling between a small modular nuclear reactor and a high-temperature steam electrolysis process: energy performance mapping of key design options

Nicolas Tauveron, David Haubensack, Ph. Dumoulin, N. Alpy
article en

Abstract

• 16 layouts coupling a Small Modular Reactor to High-Temperature Electrolysis compared. • A 13% H 2 production gain obtained by the main layout vs the uncoupled thermal layout. • Results on the main configuration deviate by 3% from a freely available heat layout. • Results on the main configuration outperform the heat-pump solution by more than 4 %. • The solutions with two-ways thermal coupling more efficient than the one-way layout. This article presents the main results of a three-year R&D program on the coupling of a Small Modular Reactor (SMR) nuclear unit to a hydrogen production process using High-Temperature Steam Electrolysis (HTSE). Different coupling architectures are investigated and their energetic evaluation is performed in comparison with a reference configuration. The separate effects that are considered are comprehensive and include: thermal coupling (with or without, unidirectional or bidirectional − modulo internal heat recovery effort in the HTSE process itself), direct or indirect steam supply, location of the Rankine cycle extraction point, pressurization of the HTSE (with or without mechanical energy recovery through gas expansion) and oxygen content (impact of the swept gas). Remarkably, the simulation results obtained on the reference configuration show a gain of over 13% in hydrogen production compared with the solution involving no thermal coupling between the SMR and the HTSE process (when HTSE heat is provided through electrical heaters), with a deviation as low as 3 % from an idealized configuration with freely available heat. It even outperforms the heat-pump solution by more than 4 %. These key energetic results were supplemented by other technical criteria, such as those relating to safety and technological maturity.

Sustainable Energy Technologies and AssessmentsVol. 85
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Laboratoire d’Innovation pour les Technologies des Énergies Nouvelles et les nanomatériaux (FR), CEA Cadarache (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.