Facets of Social Evaluation Differentially Predict Intergroup Bias Toward Occupational and Migrant Groups

Stereotype content research identifies groups at risk of being negatively stereotyped. The present research investigated the dimensionality of the facets of social evaluation (ability, assertiveness, friendliness, morality) as well as their sociostructural predictors (status and threat) and consequences (intergroup emotions and behavioral intentions) based on the SCM/BIAS map. We tested our predictions in two different societal domains: occupations and migrants from different countries of origin. Across two preregistered studies (Study 1: N = 720, Study 2: N = 688) with samples representative of the German population regarding age and gender, results revealed comparatively domain-independent predictions of status and threat, but domain-dependent predictions of the facets on the downstream variables. We highlight the value of integrating the facets into the SCM/BIAS map for research on prejudice and discrimination within and across societal domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506251399234
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facets of Social Evaluation Differentially Predict Intergroup Bias Toward Occupational and Migrant Groups

Maria‐Therese Friehs, Nathalie Bick, Helen Landmann, Patrick F. Kotzur et al.
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Facets of Social Evaluation Differentially Predict Intergroup Bias Toward Occupational and Migrant Groups

Maria‐Therese Friehs, Nathalie Bick, Helen Landmann, Patrick F. Kotzur, Laura Froehlich
article en

Abstract

Stereotype content research identifies groups at risk of being negatively stereotyped. The present research investigated the dimensionality of the facets of social evaluation (ability, assertiveness, friendliness, morality) as well as their sociostructural predictors (status and threat) and consequences (intergroup emotions and behavioral intentions) based on the SCM/BIAS map. We tested our predictions in two different societal domains: occupations and migrants from different countries of origin. Across two preregistered studies (Study 1: N = 720, Study 2: N = 688) with samples representative of the German population regarding age and gender, results revealed comparatively domain-independent predictions of status and threat, but domain-dependent predictions of the facets on the downstream variables. We highlight the value of integrating the facets into the SCM/BIAS map for research on prejudice and discrimination within and across societal domains.

Social Psychological and Personality Science
FernUniversität in Hagen (DE), Durham University (GB), University of Klagenfurt (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Facets of Social Evaluation Differentially Predict Intergroup Bias Toward Occupational and Migrant Groups — Maria‐Therese Friehs, Nathalie Bick, et al. · Social Psychological and Personality Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS