Vonoprazan-related adverse events: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system

This study comprehensively evaluated the safety profile of Vonoprazan using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter (Q1) of 2023 through the first quarter (Q1) of 2025. This analysis was restricted to real-world reports collected after the U. S. approval of vonoprazan, to better reflect its current clinical use pattern in the United States. Reports in which Vonoprazan was designated as the primary suspect(PS) drug were systematically extracted, and duplicate entries were removed using MySQL(version 8.0.42). Adverse events were coded in according tothe Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA, version 24.0). To detect potential safety signals, four disproportionality methods were applied: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Differences between serious and non-serious adverse events were further examined using Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Temporal patterns of adverse event occurrence were evaluated using Time-to-Onset (TTO) analysis and Weibull Shape Parameter (WSP) modeling. In total, 978 vonoprazan-related cases were included; females accounted 62.0% of reports, and 34.3% of events were classified as serious. Forty seven preferred terms (PTs) met predefined signal criteria, and 16 of these, such as facial paralysis and cholecystitis, were not listed in the current U. S. FDA prescribing information for vonoprazan. Serious adverse events were more often associated with renal impairment and haematemesis, whereas non-serious events were predominantly gastrointestinal. Stratified analyses further revealed several potential high-risk signals, particularly inmale and elderly patients. The median time to onset was 7 days, and most events occurred within the first 30 days after treatment initiation. Weighted Survival Probability (WSP) analysis suggested an "early failure" pattern, and co-administration of aspirin and other acid-suppressing agents was common. In conclusion, this study provides a systematic characterization of Vonoprazan- associated adverse events and highlights several potential new safety signals that are not currently reflected in the drug's labeling, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating safety signals that may inform future prospective monitoring and clinician counseling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1688914
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vonoprazan-related adverse events: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system

Zhong Huang, Xiaobin Luo, Wang Li, Jie Zhang et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Medicine
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
1.31
article

Vonoprazan-related adverse events: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system

Zhong Huang, Xiaobin Luo, Wang Li, Jie Zhang, Chuan Hou, Yali Zhong, Dongmei Xiong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study comprehensively evaluated the safety profile of Vonoprazan using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter (Q1) of 2023 through the first quarter (Q1) of 2025. This analysis was restricted to real-world reports collected after the U. S. approval of vonoprazan, to better reflect its current clinical use pattern in the United States. Reports in which Vonoprazan was designated as the primary suspect(PS) drug were systematically extracted, and duplicate entries were removed using MySQL(version 8.0.42). Adverse events were coded in according tothe Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA, version 24.0). To detect potential safety signals, four disproportionality methods were applied: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Differences between serious and non-serious adverse events were further examined using Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Temporal patterns of adverse event occurrence were evaluated using Time-to-Onset (TTO) analysis and Weibull Shape Parameter (WSP) modeling. In total, 978 vonoprazan-related cases were included; females accounted 62.0% of reports, and 34.3% of events were classified as serious. Forty seven preferred terms (PTs) met predefined signal criteria, and 16 of these, such as facial paralysis and cholecystitis, were not listed in the current U. S. FDA prescribing information for vonoprazan. Serious adverse events were more often associated with renal impairment and haematemesis, whereas non-serious events were predominantly gastrointestinal. Stratified analyses further revealed several potential high-risk signals, particularly inmale and elderly patients. The median time to onset was 7 days, and most events occurred within the first 30 days after treatment initiation. Weighted Survival Probability (WSP) analysis suggested an "early failure" pattern, and co-administration of aspirin and other acid-suppressing agents was common. In conclusion, this study provides a systematic characterization of Vonoprazan- associated adverse events and highlights several potential new safety signals that are not currently reflected in the drug's labeling, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating safety signals that may inform future prospective monitoring and clinician counseling.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 12
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Sichuan Medical University (CN), Zigong First People's Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.