The impact of dose rate optimisation and robust optimisation on FLASH proton therapy treatment plan quality and dose rates

Dose rate optimised FLASH-PT plans were associated with significantly worse target dose coverage, whilst significantly improving dose rate coverages to organs at risk, compared to non-dose rate optimised plans. The use of dose rate optimisation should be used with caution as it may lead to degraded plan quality. Robust optimisation improved target coverage compared to margin-based plans, without compromising dose rate coverage. FLASH-PT plans struggle to achieve IMPT-equivalent D<sub>95%</sub> and is associated with non-significant increases in organ at risk doses compared to IMPT, regardless of TPSs and treatment planning techniques (margin and robust). Future work will focus on improving D<sub>95%</sub>, reducing organ at risk doses, and optimising MU/spot delivery to improve plan quality, while further increasing the dose rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1638319
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of dose rate optimisation and robust optimisation on FLASH proton therapy treatment plan quality and dose rates

Nathalie Lövgren, Erik Tranéus, Kristoffer Petersson, Rasmus Nilsson
Frontiers in Oncology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

The impact of dose rate optimisation and robust optimisation on FLASH proton therapy treatment plan quality and dose rates

Nathalie Lövgren, Erik Tranéus, Kristoffer Petersson, Rasmus Nilsson
article en

Abstract

Dose rate optimised FLASH-PT plans were associated with significantly worse target dose coverage, whilst significantly improving dose rate coverages to organs at risk, compared to non-dose rate optimised plans. The use of dose rate optimisation should be used with caution as it may lead to degraded plan quality. Robust optimisation improved target coverage compared to margin-based plans, without compromising dose rate coverage. FLASH-PT plans struggle to achieve IMPT-equivalent D<sub>95%</sub> and is associated with non-significant increases in organ at risk doses compared to IMPT, regardless of TPSs and treatment planning techniques (margin and robust). Future work will focus on improving D<sub>95%</sub>, reducing organ at risk doses, and optimising MU/spot delivery to improve plan quality, while further increasing the dose rates.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 15
University of Oxford (GB), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Science Oxford (GB), RaySearch Laboratories (Sweden) (SE)
University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of dose rate optimisation and robust optimisation on FLASH proton therapy treatment plan quality and dose rates — Nathalie Lövgren, Erik Tranéus, et al. · Frontiers in Oncology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS