Ship insurance in the era of AI: An intelligent risk profiling system under the POM principles

Abstract As the origin of modern commercial insurance, ship insurance underpins global maritime supply chain stability. Yet shipping modernization and AI advances expose three flaws in traditional risk profiling: misalignment with frequency‐severity pricing, inadequate for accommodating to complex risk factor system, and lack of data stream adjustment mechanisms. To address these, we propose POM principles ( Personalized risk portrait , Omnispective risk factors , and Maneuverable calibration ) and an AI framework with three cores: (1) extensible “retrospective + prospective” risk factors; (2) independent AI modules for premium rate/insurance amount prediction; (3) data steam calibration on historical data. Validated via 15,007 records (15% of China's 2016–2021 registered ships) using random forest regression, it outperforms traditional generalized linear models and mainstream machine learning models in accuracy and risk differentiation. This pioneers intelligent ship insurance profiling, fills gaps in individualized pricing, and offers insights for sectors like aviation insurance, sharing its “premium rate × insurance amount” logic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk & Insurance
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70033
Primary Topic
Maritime Navigation and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ship insurance in the era of AI: An intelligent risk profiling system under the POM principles

Mo Yang, Menghan Zhang, Fangping Yu, Zhengxiao Li
Journal of Risk & Insurance
Maritime Navigation and Safety
article

Ship insurance in the era of AI: An intelligent risk profiling system under the POM principles

Mo Yang, Menghan Zhang, Fangping Yu, Zhengxiao Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract As the origin of modern commercial insurance, ship insurance underpins global maritime supply chain stability. Yet shipping modernization and AI advances expose three flaws in traditional risk profiling: misalignment with frequency‐severity pricing, inadequate for accommodating to complex risk factor system, and lack of data stream adjustment mechanisms. To address these, we propose POM principles ( Personalized risk portrait , Omnispective risk factors , and Maneuverable calibration ) and an AI framework with three cores: (1) extensible “retrospective + prospective” risk factors; (2) independent AI modules for premium rate/insurance amount prediction; (3) data steam calibration on historical data. Validated via 15,007 records (15% of China's 2016–2021 registered ships) using random forest regression, it outperforms traditional generalized linear models and mainstream machine learning models in accuracy and risk differentiation. This pioneers intelligent ship insurance profiling, fills gaps in individualized pricing, and offers insights for sectors like aviation insurance, sharing its “premium rate × insurance amount” logic.

Journal of Risk & InsuranceVol. 93(1)
Dongbei University of Finance and Economics (CN), University of International Business and Economics (CN), Dalian Maritime University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Maritime Navigation and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ship insurance in the era of AI: An intelligent risk profiling system under the POM principles — Mo Yang, Menghan Zhang, et al. · Journal of Risk & Insurance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS