The Strengths and Challenges of Conventional Short-Term Genetic Toxicity Assays

The field of toxicology is moving forward rapidly, and the trend is toward non-animal testing. In terms of genetic toxicity testing, there are many accepted OECD test guidelines reliant on in vivo animal models. In the interest of providing a complete picture of the methods available for both animal-derived and non-animal genetic toxicity testing, Part I in the series discusses the existing short-term accepted test methodologies, while Part II examines available New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). The advantages and disadvantages of the current methodologies are discussed here, while those of new methodologies and the current regulatory landscape relative to them are reserved for discussion in Part II.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Biology Journal
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0118741967398367251010080427
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Strengths and Challenges of Conventional Short-Term Genetic Toxicity Assays

Lynn M. Crosby
The Open Biology Journal
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
article

The Strengths and Challenges of Conventional Short-Term Genetic Toxicity Assays

Lynn M. Crosby
article en

Abstract

The field of toxicology is moving forward rapidly, and the trend is toward non-animal testing. In terms of genetic toxicity testing, there are many accepted OECD test guidelines reliant on in vivo animal models. In the interest of providing a complete picture of the methods available for both animal-derived and non-animal genetic toxicity testing, Part I in the series discusses the existing short-term accepted test methodologies, while Part II examines available New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). The advantages and disadvantages of the current methodologies are discussed here, while those of new methodologies and the current regulatory landscape relative to them are reserved for discussion in Part II.

The Open Biology JournalVol. 12(1)
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.