From cognitive coherence to political polarization: A data‐driven agent‐based model of belief change

Abstract Political polarization represents a rising issue in many countries, making it more and more important to understand its relation to cognitive‐motivational and social influence mechanisms. Yet, the link between micro‐level mechanisms and macro‐level phenomena remains unclear. We investigated the consequences of individuals striving for cognitive coherence in their belief systems on political polarization in society in an agent‐based model. In this, we formalized how cognitive coherence affects how individuals update their beliefs following social influence and self‐reflection processes. We derive agents' political beliefs as well as their subjective belief systems, defining what determines coherence for different individuals, from European Social Survey data via correlational class analysis. The simulation shows that agents polarize in their beliefs when they have a strong strive for cognitive coherence, and especially when they have structurally different belief systems. In a mathematical analysis, we not only explain the main findings but also underscore the necessity of simulations for understanding the complex dynamics of socially embedded phenomena such as political polarization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Psychology
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70099
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From cognitive coherence to political polarization: A data‐driven agent‐based model of belief change

Bruce Edmonds, František Kalvas, Jan Lorenz, Peter Steiglechner et al.
Political Psychology
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
article

From cognitive coherence to political polarization: A data‐driven agent‐based model of belief change

Bruce Edmonds, František Kalvas, Jan Lorenz, Peter Steiglechner, Marlene C. L. Batzke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Political polarization represents a rising issue in many countries, making it more and more important to understand its relation to cognitive‐motivational and social influence mechanisms. Yet, the link between micro‐level mechanisms and macro‐level phenomena remains unclear. We investigated the consequences of individuals striving for cognitive coherence in their belief systems on political polarization in society in an agent‐based model. In this, we formalized how cognitive coherence affects how individuals update their beliefs following social influence and self‐reflection processes. We derive agents' political beliefs as well as their subjective belief systems, defining what determines coherence for different individuals, from European Social Survey data via correlational class analysis. The simulation shows that agents polarize in their beliefs when they have a strong strive for cognitive coherence, and especially when they have structurally different belief systems. In a mathematical analysis, we not only explain the main findings but also underscore the necessity of simulations for understanding the complex dynamics of socially embedded phenomena such as political polarization.

Political Psychology
Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Constructor University (DE), Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate (NO), Complexity Science Hub (AT), Centre for Policy Studies (IN), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO), Umeå University (SE), University of West Bohemia in Pilsen (CZ)
Západočeská Univerzita v Plzni, Leverhulme Trust, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Austrian Science Fund, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.