Conversational AI agents in education: an umbrella review of current utilization, challenges, and future directions for ethical and responsible use

Abstract The use of Conversational AI (CAI) agents within education has seen a rise with the rapid integration of generative AI (GenAI). The generative ability of the application combined with conversational capabilities has enhanced the perceived and actual usefulness of CAI applications. Given this development, it is critical to undertake a comprehensive review to understand the actual application domains, challenges, and efforts within this area. A range of empirical studies as well as reviews have been undertaken in recent years, but the current understanding remains fragmented. To better understand the current state-of-the-art, current trends and future implications of CAI on education, we conducted an umbrella review (UR) to systematically synthesize findings from thirty-four review articles. Articles were collected through a search across five major databases. They were screened using predefined eligibility criteria focusing on CAI agents used across educational domains and contexts. The PRISMA framework for transparent reporting is followed throughout the process and a thematic analysis has been undertaken to analyze the data. The results show that CAI utilization is concentrated in pedagogical applications such as teaching support, psychological engagement, and metacognitive development, while administrative functions, research assistance, and specialized training remain underdeveloped. Technical limitations and concerns with educational impact dominate discussions. Ethically, human-AI relationship concerns persist across all CAI generations, while academic integrity and data privacy represent emerging areas of concern. The review reveals gaps in CAI frameworks: lack of end-to-end design guidance, weak CAI specific usability methods, unclear pedagogical guidance and classroom implementation strategies, and limited AI literacy support. The article concludes by proposing a roadmap for ethical CAI implementation in education and identifying priority areas for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00916-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conversational AI agents in education: an umbrella review of current utilization, challenges, and future directions for ethical and responsible use

Aqdas Malik, Aditya Johri, Amrita Ganguly, Nafisa Mehjabin
1 citations
AI and Ethics
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
article

Conversational AI agents in education: an umbrella review of current utilization, challenges, and future directions for ethical and responsible use

Aqdas Malik, Aditya Johri, Amrita Ganguly, Nafisa Mehjabin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The use of Conversational AI (CAI) agents within education has seen a rise with the rapid integration of generative AI (GenAI). The generative ability of the application combined with conversational capabilities has enhanced the perceived and actual usefulness of CAI applications. Given this development, it is critical to undertake a comprehensive review to understand the actual application domains, challenges, and efforts within this area. A range of empirical studies as well as reviews have been undertaken in recent years, but the current understanding remains fragmented. To better understand the current state-of-the-art, current trends and future implications of CAI on education, we conducted an umbrella review (UR) to systematically synthesize findings from thirty-four review articles. Articles were collected through a search across five major databases. They were screened using predefined eligibility criteria focusing on CAI agents used across educational domains and contexts. The PRISMA framework for transparent reporting is followed throughout the process and a thematic analysis has been undertaken to analyze the data. The results show that CAI utilization is concentrated in pedagogical applications such as teaching support, psychological engagement, and metacognitive development, while administrative functions, research assistance, and specialized training remain underdeveloped. Technical limitations and concerns with educational impact dominate discussions. Ethically, human-AI relationship concerns persist across all CAI generations, while academic integrity and data privacy represent emerging areas of concern. The review reveals gaps in CAI frameworks: lack of end-to-end design guidance, weak CAI specific usability methods, unclear pedagogical guidance and classroom implementation strategies, and limited AI literacy support. The article concludes by proposing a roadmap for ethical CAI implementation in education and identifying priority areas for future research.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(1)
George Mason University (US), Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.