Worker‐organization goal misalignment and support for collective action

Abstract As workplace inequality persists, understanding the psychological processes motivating collective action engagement becomes imperative. In one domain of collective action, labor unionization, membership in the United States has continuously declined since the 1980s. Despite this decline, recent surveys suggest that pro‐union sentiment is rising. Amid workplace inequity and rising public interest in unionization, we draw from research on collective action and organizational identification to examine whether exposure to worker‐organization conflict and information about unions changes how workers evaluate existing and novel organizational grievance procedures, and consequently, increases pro‐union sentiment. Across four studies ( N = 3,143), we find that exposure to workplace conflicts and information about unions reduces workers’ perceived alignment with organizational grievance procedures and increases pro‐union attitudes, relative to control conditions where participants are not exposed to information about unions. These findings have implications for employee wellbeing and for the psychological processes implicated in collective action organizing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.70044
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Worker‐organization goal misalignment and support for collective action

Michael W. Kraus, Megan Burns
1 citations
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
article

Worker‐organization goal misalignment and support for collective action

Michael W. Kraus, Megan Burns
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract As workplace inequality persists, understanding the psychological processes motivating collective action engagement becomes imperative. In one domain of collective action, labor unionization, membership in the United States has continuously declined since the 1980s. Despite this decline, recent surveys suggest that pro‐union sentiment is rising. Amid workplace inequity and rising public interest in unionization, we draw from research on collective action and organizational identification to examine whether exposure to worker‐organization conflict and information about unions changes how workers evaluate existing and novel organizational grievance procedures, and consequently, increases pro‐union sentiment. Across four studies ( N = 3,143), we find that exposure to workplace conflicts and information about unions reduces workers’ perceived alignment with organizational grievance procedures and increases pro‐union attitudes, relative to control conditions where participants are not exposed to information about unions. These findings have implications for employee wellbeing and for the psychological processes implicated in collective action organizing.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 25(3)
Northwestern University (US), Evanston Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.