Cancer-related lymphedema educational needs disparities and optimization strategies

Three latent class profiles were identified: low-level, medium-level and high-level KAP. Education, experience in CRL management, professional title and department significantly influenced the KAP categories. Preferences for instructional strategies varied across profiles: Groups 1 and 2 favored structured instruction, whereas Group 3 preferred methods enriched with interactive elements. Thematic analysis identified several key barriers to lymphedema service implementation by HCWs, including resource investment, public awareness, medical security coverage, etc. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal heterogeneous KAP profiles and distinct learning method preferences among HCWs. This heterogeneity suggests a potential direction for developing stratified training tailored to specific needs or competency levels. Future optimization of the lymphedema care environment requires multifaceted interventions at the policy, regulatory, staffing and patient levels.