Attentional bias alignment for pain: A neurophysiological approach

Attentional bias (AB) toward pain-related information has been implicated in the development and maintenance of pain problems. Recent theoretical frameworks propose that AB is not a fixed trait but rather a dynamic process that aligns with contextual and goal-related factors. A Virtual Reality (VR) paradigm-PainFlex-was recently developed to assess AB alignment. In this study, the PainFlex paradigm was combined with neurophysiological indices of somatosensory attention to obtain a measure of AB uncontaminated by task instructions. Participants were approached by dynamic stimuli directed at a hand either threatened by pain or not and were exposed to a CS+ (i.e., a pen previously paired with pain) or a CS- (i.e., a pen never paired with pain). Tactile stimuli were delivered to either the threatened or the safe hand to elicit somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Results showed that N120 amplitudes were significantly higher at the threat location compared to the safe location, indicating AB. Additionally, P200 amplitudes were reduced at the safe location, but only when the nopain side was approached, suggesting a dynamic and context-dependent response. Contrary to the hypothesis, no interaction with CS type emerged for either component, indicating that AB did not align with changes in the presence of threat as was expected. In conclusion, these findings provide only partial support for the context-sensitivity of AB, highlighting the complexity of attentional processes in pain-related contexts. PERSPECTIVE: This study integrates EEG with a VR paradigm to examine attentional bias in pain. Findings show enhanced somatosensory responses to threat but limited alignment with contextual cues, underscoring the complexity of attentional processes in pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pain
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105641
Primary Topic
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attentional bias alignment for pain: A neurophysiological approach

Eleana A. Pinto, Stefaan Van Damme, Janny Goris, Richard Benning et al.
Journal of Pain
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Attentional bias alignment for pain: A neurophysiological approach

Eleana A. Pinto, Stefaan Van Damme, Janny Goris, Richard Benning, Dimitri Van Ryckeghem
article en

Abstract

Attentional bias (AB) toward pain-related information has been implicated in the development and maintenance of pain problems. Recent theoretical frameworks propose that AB is not a fixed trait but rather a dynamic process that aligns with contextual and goal-related factors. A Virtual Reality (VR) paradigm-PainFlex-was recently developed to assess AB alignment. In this study, the PainFlex paradigm was combined with neurophysiological indices of somatosensory attention to obtain a measure of AB uncontaminated by task instructions. Participants were approached by dynamic stimuli directed at a hand either threatened by pain or not and were exposed to a CS+ (i.e., a pen previously paired with pain) or a CS- (i.e., a pen never paired with pain). Tactile stimuli were delivered to either the threatened or the safe hand to elicit somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Results showed that N120 amplitudes were significantly higher at the threat location compared to the safe location, indicating AB. Additionally, P200 amplitudes were reduced at the safe location, but only when the nopain side was approached, suggesting a dynamic and context-dependent response. Contrary to the hypothesis, no interaction with CS type emerged for either component, indicating that AB did not align with changes in the presence of threat as was expected. In conclusion, these findings provide only partial support for the context-sensitivity of AB, highlighting the complexity of attentional processes in pain-related contexts. PERSPECTIVE: This study integrates EEG with a VR paradigm to examine attentional bias in pain. Findings show enhanced somatosensory responses to threat but limited alignment with contextual cues, underscoring the complexity of attentional processes in pain.

Journal of PainVol. 40
University of Luxembourg (LU), Ghent University (BE), Maastricht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Attentional bias alignment for pain: A neurophysiological approach — Eleana A. Pinto, Stefaan Van Damme, et al. · Journal of Pain (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS